Re: 3222 : Sun Apr 07, 2013 1:45 pm  

vekder wrote:

Poor comeback.

To be fair your post didn't set the bar very high (although I agree with the sentiment) but please feel free to come back when you've learned the relevance of context (eg you don't regularly suffer such massive defeats, you had least won on GF andon more than 7 occasions in the last 39 games.)

Re: 3222 : Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:13 pm  

smoking monkey wrote:

To be fair your post didn't set the bar very high (although I agree with the sentiment) but please feel free to come back when you've learned the relevance of context (eg you don't regularly suffer such massive defeats, you had least won on GF andon more than 7 occasions in the last 39 games.)

you only sing when you're winning then?

Re: 3222 : Mon Apr 08, 2013 6:39 am  

vekder wrote:

you only sing when you're winning then?

Re: 3222 : Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:09 pm  

At the moment Cas don't have a proper club (BOD) and aren't even playing a proper sport (RFL). That would have been enough to keep us two Silver members away from the Giants match were it not for the fact that we'd promised to take family members to the game.

Not a proper supporter then? Frankly I couldn't give a 'love' whether anyone thinks I am or not. Hopefully 3222 will send (has sent?) a message to get things turned around and sharpish. If the aim is to kill off Cas then all parties are doing a damn fine job.

Re: 3222 : Tue Apr 09, 2013 6:12 pm  

The game is now to expensive to run on gate money and sky money.Would it be possible for the RFL to squeeze some more cash from Sky.

Re: 3222 : Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:09 am  

if they do, we won't see a penny of it.

even though 3222 is rubbish (matched by our performances though) it's noticeable that the London attendances are sneaking iowards 3 figures, yet not a word is being said - having won 3(?) games to our 1