pyeman wrote:
They aren't our only 4 players who can play prop you know, massey, nash, martin and snitch can all play there. Strange how you include your fringe players when comparing depth but not ours.
wildie isnt in the same league as clark and milner.
We have other players who can play in the halfs too, brierly, goldy, thompson can all play in the halfs.
orr is organiser, pace isn't the main asset he needs to posses, deacon has played a big role at wigan the last few seasons but hasn't had pace in years.
I do agree with you on Tim Smith, disappointing signing but always an outside chance he’ll come good. But please spare me the Huby hype, he’s a good average SL prop that’s all and Johnson has had a great season in a poor team, many times against decent team he would put us on the front foot with his runs. Most Hubys so called impressive performance came early season when you had a run of form against weak out of form teams. Any average prop can look good charging into a retreating Crusaders defence, the real test come when you play the good teams before he got injured he was basically a no show in them games.
Clarke better than Ellis pull the other one. Maybe Clarke will turn into a better player but all we have is potential, that’s it! He could turn into a no mark average player we just don’t know. Please don’t mistake potential for class. As for Milner overhyped! Massy and Nash and front row, Brierly or Tomphson in the halfs, what a prospect, I bet SL defences are shaking in the boots!!!!!!!!!!
So we are down to opinions here so only time will tell. Lets just let the field do the talking.