Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Thu Jul 15, 2010 9:21 am  

Fully wrote:

Not really because there's going to be a road that links up to the new link road at the bottom of Cutsyke, so traffic can be alleviated two ways. As for Xscape/J32 not backing it, I'm pretty sure they would. Not only would it stimulate the number of people drinking/visiting in these places, the fact they get such custom will surely drive up rental prices for shops/spaces in there thus improving their own profitability.

Incidentally, Waystone have recently got outline planning permission for housing on the land behind Flass Lane in Cutsyke too.

There is already a (renewed) dispersal order to remove unwanted cars not using facilities. I'm sure there will be some large parking fines and people not visiting again. They are throwing residential areas up in the area all the time so Cas have to act fast before opposing momentum manifests.

Incidently Fully are there one way systems currently being implemented in the area? I dropped my gf off at the College and it took me about 50 minutes to get out of the area.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Thu Jul 15, 2010 9:23 am  

Lupset_Airport wrote:

There is already a (renewed) dispersal order to remove unwanted cars not using facilities. I'm sure there will be some large parking fines and people not visiting again. They are throwing residential areas up in the area all the time so Cas have to act fast before opposing momentum manifests.

Incidently Fully are there one way systems currently being implemented in the area? I dropped my gf off at the College and it took me about 50 minutes to get out of the area.

Dispersal orders to get rid of cars doing 'cruises' and such like. Most of those parking in the Xscape facility on game day will actually be using the bars and such like in there.

As for opposition, it's too late for that. Outline (the major one) planning permission has already been given, although it really is too far away to have any impact on residential areas - the noise from Xscape is more likely to be of detriment.

And no, there is no one way system being implemented. The roads were abysmal around there - they are just relaying it all.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Thu Jul 15, 2010 9:54 am  

Lupset_Airport wrote:

There is already a (renewed) dispersal order to remove unwanted cars not using facilities. I'm sure there will be some large parking fines and people not visiting again. They are throwing residential areas up in the area all the time so Cas have to act fast before opposing momentum manifests.

Incidently Fully are there one way systems currently being implemented in the area? I dropped my gf off at the College and it took me about 50 minutes to get out of the area.

You really do not know anything about this do you?

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:23 am  

Fully wrote:

Dispersal orders to get rid of cars doing 'cruises' and such like. Most of those parking in the Xscape facility on game day will actually be using the bars and such like in there.

As for opposition, it's too late for that. Outline (the major one) planning permission has already been given, although it really is too far away to have any impact on residential areas - the noise from Xscape is more likely to be of detriment.

And no, there is no one way system being implemented. The roads were abysmal around there - they are just relaying it all.

It's the businesses that didn't want the Cars there and it takes a trip to hell and back to secure an order. I'm sure signs will go up in the cars parks ala Crown Point saying that this car park is for Xscape only etc.


But that's all incidental if Cas are struggling as much as we are and the relevant authorities strongly backed a joint venture I do strongly believe Newmarket is a very neutral (but equally cr*p location) area unlike Glasshoughton. Based in WF4 I live 12 miles from Newmarket, not many Cas based fans will need to travel that far.

I'd be happy to play at Glasshoughton if it meant it gave us a few years to sort out Newmarket but I wouldn't enjoy it so much if it was long term. SL survival at all costs though save for a merger!

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Thu Jul 15, 2010 11:14 am  

Lupset_Airport wrote:

I'd be happy to play at Glasshoughton if it meant it gave us a few years to sort out Newmarket but I wouldn't enjoy it so much if it was long term. SL survival at all costs though save for a merger!

I could accept that. But I'd rather be in NL1 than groundshare permanently.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:24 pm  

Lupset_Airport wrote:

It's the businesses that didn't want the Cars there and it takes a trip to hell and back to secure an order. I'm sure signs will go up in the cars parks ala Crown Point saying that this car park is for Xscape only etc.


But that's all incidental if Cas are struggling as much as we are and the relevant authorities strongly backed a joint venture I do strongly believe Newmarket is a very neutral (but equally cr*p location) area unlike Glasshoughton. Based in WF4 I live 12 miles from Newmarket, not many Cas based fans will need to travel that far.

I'd be happy to play at Glasshoughton if it meant it gave us a few years to sort out Newmarket but I wouldn't enjoy it so much if it was long term. SL survival at all costs though save for a merger!

I think Xscape would put up with a few people parking there in the hope they would visit before or/and after a match . Don't forget the plans show 1,125 car parking spaces at the stadium (Newmarket 800)not including the Xscape overflow which is hardly used now.
Please feel free to come and ground share with us - it will be easier for you to park!!

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Thu Jul 15, 2010 9:27 pm  

Lupset_Airport wrote:

It's the businesses that didn't want the Cars there and it takes a trip to hell and back to secure an order. I'm sure signs will go up in the cars parks ala Crown Point saying that this car park is for Xscape only etc.


But that's all incidental if Cas are struggling as much as we are and the relevant authorities strongly backed a joint venture I do strongly believe Newmarket is a very neutral (but equally cr*p location) area unlike Glasshoughton. Based in WF4 I live 12 miles from Newmarket, not many Cas based fans will need to travel that far.

I'd be happy to play at Glasshoughton if it meant it gave us a few years to sort out Newmarket but I wouldn't enjoy it so much if it was long term. SL survival at all costs though save for a merger!

Which firms dont want the cars there? most will benifit from people being there, the shops, bars and places to eat will all be in favour.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Thu Jul 15, 2010 9:50 pm  

Lupset_Airport wrote:

It's the businesses that didn't want the Cars there and it takes a trip to hell and back to secure an order. I'm sure signs will go up in the cars parks ala Crown Point saying that this car park is for Xscape only etc.

Given that most people are mercenary b**tards, I'd expect to see signs going up saying: "Matchday Parking - Only £5".

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:49 am  

pyeman wrote:

Which firms dont want the cars there? most will benifit from people being there, the shops, bars and places to eat will all be in favour.

Spot on. When me and my lad go to the rugby, the missus and daughter stay at home. If we get the stadium at Glasshoughton then my missus and daughter have both stated they will go to Xscape and Freeport to watch a film, go shopping or whatever. I know where i'll be parking.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:05 am  

Ya can park at mine Marshy it will only be a 10 min walk lol