Re: Feisal Nahaboo : Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:00 pm  

deeHell wrote:

Just when did Wakey approach the phoney pharaoh and get rebuffed? I’m not aware of it. I suspect it’s just another made up Castleford urban myth. I don’t think anyone really hate the guy at Wakey, for me personally he’s been a great source of amusement especially when I’ve been proved right about his motivations from day one.

Because you dont like the truth doesnt make it a myth now does it.

Re: Feisal Nahaboo : Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:24 pm  

forrard wrote:

Because you dont like the truth doesnt make it a myth now does it.

In the absence of any definitive proof and a poor source it’s safe to say that it can be regarded as total rubbish. But what ever makes you feel better…….

Re: Feisal Nahaboo : Sat Mar 24, 2012 2:51 pm  

deeHell wrote:

In the absence of any definitive proof and a poor source it’s safe to say that it can be regarded as total rubbish. But what ever makes you feel better…….

To be honest I think the way things are going for Cas and Wakey the RFL are just gona get fed up of the false promises and one of you will get binned for sure, my monies on Cas.

I've said before I would rather stay in the Chamionship and have a team the competes every week instead getting hammered every week like cas n Widnes.

Re: Feisal Nahaboo : Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:53 pm  

cushler wrote:

To be honest I think the way things are going for Cas and Wakey the RFL are just gona get fed up of the false promises and one of you will get binned for sure, my monies on Cas.

I've said before I would rather stay in the Chamionship and have a team the competes every week instead getting hammered every week like cas n Widnes.

Like you have a choice about superleague.

As for the RFL I think they will jettison both Cas and Wakey and play the merger card again . They are that trustworthy

Re: Feisal Nahaboo : Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:58 pm  

deeHell wrote:

In the absence of any definitive proof and a poor source it’s safe to say that it can be regarded as total rubbish. But what ever makes you feel better…….

Not bitter at all are you lol

probiz didnt want to be associated with the stadium scroungers .............. live with it

Re: Feisal Nahaboo : Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:02 pm  

forrard wrote:

Not bitter at all are you lol

probiz didnt want to be associated with the stadium scroungers .............. live with it

Says who?

Re: Feisal Nahaboo : Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:06 pm  

inside man wrote:

Says who?

Feisal said Elston approached him about sponsoring Wakefield and he turned them down.

Re: Feisal Nahaboo : Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:13 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

Feisal said Elston approached him about sponsoring Wakefield and he turned them down.

They dont like the truth gronk, so you will be branded as a rumour monger by the polecats.

It was nice to see they accepted the nickname ''stadium scroungers''

Re: Feisal Nahaboo : Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:32 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

Feisal said Elston approached him about sponsoring Wakefield and he turned them down.

Sorry Gronk but i don't and never have believed a word that blokes said, and it seems i am right not to, the amount of times he's said "this and that" to please who ever may listen, just look at his track record and tell me i'm wrong.

James should and would have asked every posiible sponsor but please lets not make it sound like the great one knocked us back and thats some sort of victory, its more a the great escape.

Re: Feisal Nahaboo : Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:50 pm  

BIGAL1 wrote:

Sorry Gronk but i don't and never have believed a word that blokes said.

I never said I believed it, I was just stating where the info had come from.