Re: At what expense : Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:58 pm  

ISPY wrote:

No- K-SA RA SA RA DONT FOB ME OFF

As in the song:

"K-SA RA SA RA WOTEVA WIL B WIL B WEER GOIN 2 WEMBERLEE K-SA RA SA RA"

Re: At what expense : Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:01 pm  

I thought school holidays had finished?

Re: At what expense : Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:11 pm  

Looks to me like Rangi is the national side's scapegoat already for the series.

Oh and shame on you for winning the Man of Steel award...you clearly must have bribed those fellow professionals who voted for you

Re: At what expense : Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:33 pm  

duke street 10 wrote:

Looks to me like Rangi is the national side's scapegoat already for the series.

Oh and shame on you for winning the Man of Steel award...you clearly must have bribed those fellow professionals who voted for you

Apparently, according to someone on the Wigan forum, the players aren't knowledgeable enough about the game to make the correct decision regarding MoS!

Re: At what expense : Thu Nov 03, 2011 4:27 pm  

Fully wrote:

I thought school holidays had finished?

Sadly they have internet in schools nowadays, or so I'm told.

Re: At what expense : Sat Nov 05, 2011 8:09 pm  

Oh dear Rangi

Re: At what expense : Sat Nov 05, 2011 8:56 pm  

normycat wrote:

Oh dear Rangi

How many Wakey players starred in this afternoon's game, then?

Re: At what expense : Sat Nov 05, 2011 9:10 pm  

Georgie Best on a Bloomer wrote:

How many Wakey players starred in this afternoon's game, then?

They had an ex player who kept giving penalties away, does that count?

Bottom line is we could try a completely different half back combination next week there is still a gulf in class in those positions.

How many Super league sides will start with an all English half back pairing?.....not many!.

Re: At what expense : Sun Nov 06, 2011 8:01 pm  

duke street 10 wrote:

They had an ex player who kept giving penalties away, does that count?

Westwood was uncharacteristically awful wasn't he? Braying Cameron Smith during the handbags incident was praiseworthy, but in no way made up for the repeated penalties he gifted them.

We usually claim Ellis as well, but he didn't do much prior to the injury.

Re: At what expense : Sun Nov 06, 2011 8:03 pm  

bren2k wrote:

We usually claim Ellis as well, but he didn't do much prior to the injury.

Did you actually watch the game? Before he went off he was taking 2 carries a set, made a couple of half breaks and put in a fair few tackles.