[Wildthing]

Re: O/T Wakey's New Roof/s : Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:38 pm  

westyorkylad wrote:

What Mdean said - and also to add that as a Cas fan I cringe every time I see a post from neverdid, how you have not been banned from posting on this forum I will never know.

Forums are, by their definition for discussing, neverdid is incapable of anything other than insulting, tbh, you are an extremely bad advert for Cas fans in general.

Totally agree. He's an embarrasment to all decent Cas fans.

Re: O/T Wakey's New Roof/s : Fri Oct 21, 2011 4:11 pm  

smoking monkey wrote:

Disregarding para 1 as amateur psychology at it's most cliched and moving on to your remaining 'points'; 1. you rightly talk about Wakey not being forever damned for past actions but administration was only a few short months ago so why wouldn't I be irritated by suggestions that keeping promises is now some kind of WTW speciality. 2. maybe you have correctly interpreted the plans for the Doncaster Rd end but plenty of your fellow supporters were hyper ventilating about the prospects of new and completely enclosed terracing which would represent genuine, rather than 'technical', improvements.

A very half-hearted response from a usually intelligent poster; I'll put your original rant down to having a bad day and accept the above as a kind of climb down.

One good thing has come out of this thread - WTW and Cas fans are united in their belief that the best part of neverdid ran down the crack of his mum's ar5e and ended up as a brown stain on the mattress.

Re: O/T Wakey's New Roof/s : Fri Oct 21, 2011 4:30 pm  

bren2k wrote:

A very half-hearted response from a usually intelligent poster; I'll put your original rant down to having a bad day and accept the above as a kind of climb down.

One good thing has come out of this thread - WTW and Cas fans are united in their belief that the best part of neverdid ran down the crack of his mum's ar5e and ended up as a brown stain on the mattress.

He is one of the posters from both our clubs i could do without login in

Re: O/T Wakey's New Roof/s : Fri Oct 21, 2011 6:23 pm  

binks wrote:

He is one of the posters from both our clubs i could do without login in

I don't bother much with this board after he called me Alice, i can't sleep and its caused me to have time off work with stress.

My doctor is very worried about me.

Anyway back to the new roof/s, if we do get one it will probably have a leaky roof so we'll all still get wet.

Re: O/T Wakey's New Roof/s : Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:29 pm  

neverdid wrote:

Many of the debts ??? so there are still some poor suckers owed money by the scroungers ........................................ shamefull

Pardon me for appearing a bit fik but at least i pay my way in the world unlike the filth over the common

PAY YOUR DEBTS AND STOP SCROUNGING AN EXISTANCE

I'm fairly certain you don't, and as a tax payer I contribute to your job seekers allowance.
So if I were you I'd belt up!!
And if you weren't s fik you might get a job, but I doubt it!!!
I mean come on, you are hugely fik!!!!

Re: O/T Wakey's New Roof/s : Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:08 pm  

TURFEDOUT wrote:

No,you are quite correct,admin errors can occur and the public information may not be correct.

Cheers! So you have got off your high horse saying Cas should settle outstanding (disputed?) debts (approx £1000 in total) to admitting they probably have done but may not have bothered to fill in a few forms.

I agree if they have settled the debts they should have informed the CC.

Re: O/T Wakey's New Roof/s : Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:58 pm  

bigalf wrote:

Cheers! So you have got off your high horse saying Cas should settle outstanding debts to admitting they probably have done but may not have bothered to fill in a few forms.

did you not read the rest?

nowhere have i admitted that they have probably settled the debt.

Quite the contrary,errors are not common,in over 20 years involved in commercial finance ive never seen 3 errors against the same company.So i would consider that these debts are not settled.
I also dont know of many companies that would have such an appalling attitude towards their business,that they wouldnt feel the need "to fill in a few forms"in order to protect their credit rating if they knew these debts were settled.

jeez i only hope youre not in business.

Re: O/T Wakey's New Roof/s : Fri Oct 21, 2011 10:09 pm  

bigalf wrote:

Cheers! So you have got off your high horse saying Cas should settle outstanding (disputed?) debts (approx £1000 in total) to admitting they probably have done but may not have bothered to fill in a few forms.

I agree if they have settled the debts they should have informed the CC.

I see you hastily edited your original post.

In the eyes of the law they arent disputed,its already been disputed,thats why its ended up as a ccj.The court has looked at the evidence and determined Cas owe the money.

Re: O/T Wakey's New Roof/s : Fri Oct 21, 2011 10:24 pm  

TURFEDOUT wrote:

I see you hastily edited your original post.

In the eyes of the law they arent disputed,its already been disputed,thats why its ended up as a ccj.The court has looked at the evidence and determined Cas owe the money.

Correct but you or I do not know if Cas have settled after the 30 days/1 month deadline. If they have the ccj still shows unless a set aside application is made to the court.

You had better get onto the HKR forum with your little crusade:-

Date Court Amount Status Case Number Date Paid
26/06/2009 SHEFFIELD £533 Judgement 9SE07488 -
07/09/2007 KINGSTON UPON HULL £10,000 Judgement 5KH04694 -

Re: O/T Wakey's New Roof/s : Fri Oct 21, 2011 10:37 pm  

TURFEDOUT wrote:

I see you hastily edited your original post.

I inserted the word "Disputed" because that is what usually sets the wheels in motion for a CCJ. I also put in the approx total of all 3 CCJ's you are so concerned about.

I look forward to reading your post's regarding outstanding CCJ's on the HKR forum.