: Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:56 am  

He played well, got through a lot of work and put a couple of big hits on Long and Wellens.

: Sat Jun 13, 2009 5:27 pm  

Thats what I wanted to see all season if he played like that every game he would have been signed up already.

If he keeps it up Il have no complaints. I give credit where its due.

: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:08 pm  

Dettoriman wrote:

And he had an absolute stormer last night, He killed Long and Wellens

So the big second row/loose forward bashed a scrum half and a fullback

Wow, he must be awesome

: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:16 pm  

Tigerpie wrote:

So the big second row/loose forward bashed a scrum half and a fullback

Wow, he must be awesome

Haven't seen them yet, have you??

: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:39 pm  

morrissey wrote:

Haven't seen them yet, have you??

Lost me there morrisey, hope you get the point i'm making

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 4:14 pm  

The biggest thing against Faumuina is he's an overseas player and with the allowance reducing to 6 players next year we're struggling to fit him in.

We've already got Sargent, Sherwin, Chase, Widders & McGoldrick contracted for 2010 so can only have 1 further overseas player. Which means keeping only 1 of Faumuina and Evans or getting a new player in altogether.

At present I'd choose Evans over Faumuina as he's more consistent.

That said, I can't understand for the life of me why the club gave Widders a 3 yr deal or McGoldrick a 4yr deal, while at the same time refusing to offer one of our players of 2008 - Luke Dorn - anything more than a 1yr extension!

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:19 pm  

Cecil B wrote:

The biggest thing against Faumuina is he's an overseas player and with the allowance reducing to 6 players next year we're struggling to fit him in.

We've already got Sargent, Sherwin, Chase, Widders & McGoldrick contracted for 2010 so can only have 1 further overseas player. Which means keeping only 1 of Faumuina and Evans or getting a new player in altogether.

At present I'd choose Evans over Faumuina as he's more consistent.

That said, I can't understand for the life of me why the club gave Widders a 3 yr deal or McGoldrick a 4yr deal, while at the same time refusing to offer one of our players of 2008 - Luke Dorn - anything more than a 1yr extension!

It was 2 years?

Luke Dorn didn't get an extension because:

A. He didn't want one
B. Cas got better with Chase

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:29 pm  

Widders got a three year deal and is signed until the end of 2011. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 555982.stm

Widders got a three year deal and is signed until the end of 2011. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 555982.stm

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:37 pm  

You don't need to sign Sione because apparently Langley is 'nailed on' for Cas. Apparently Bulls don't want to extend his contract.

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:43 pm  

Terry Monster wrote:

You don't need to sign Sione because apparently Langley is 'nailed on' for Cas. Apparently Bulls don't want to extend his contract.

Who said nailed on

And no harm in more back rowers anyway