Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:09 pm  

But we can build it tomorrow? There is nothing false with that statement in any sense. We can start digging and start laying bricks. We wouldn't get very far in building something looking like a stadium but nonetheless we can start tomorrow because we have full planning permission. Simples really.

As for 5 weeks, I'm not sure where that would come from? My understanding is that irrespective of the type of planning, they all usually take the same amount of time although admittedly I'd guess that Outline PP takes much longer than Full PP to go through.

But as I was ridiculed on the other thread on the VT for, I would guess that this is based on everything being a best-cae scenario. I still believe that several conditions would have to be met and who knows what the Gov't will do if it does get the green light.

Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:14 pm  

supercat wrote:

Can still see us both sharing a ground to be honest. If all goes well next week it will be at NM.

Hope not - that would be the death of CT. No doubt that is what some posters on here would like to see happen.

If the rumours are to be believed regarding a take-over at CT I honestly think we will be staying at Wheldon Road.

Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:18 pm  

Tigerade wrote:

If the rumours are to be believed regarding a take-over at CT I honestly think we will be staying at Wheldon Road.

That might not be such a bad idea - you could sell the lease to the RFL to raise a load of capital, then rent it back from them for a market rate.

Oh, hang on...

Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:24 pm  

Fully wrote:

Full PP is usually 8-12 weeks Bren in terms of WMDC's turnaround for planning.

And Kinley, I'm pretty sure you're just stirring for the sake of it now. I knew it would descend down this path as soon as I posted: you Wakey lot just simply cannot resist.

Certainly not, but if you keep peddling the myth be prepared to be challenged.
Without the money you cannot and will not build, if you could I'm sure you would have by now, everyone knows the importance of these grounds, why wait if you can build tomorrow??

Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:26 pm  

Tigerade wrote:

If the rumours are to be believed regarding a take-over at CT I honestly think we will be staying at Wheldon Road.

Hardly, the supposed interested party have a main goal of getting the new stadium built ASAP and the name floating around have the funds to chip in a bit each to get it built and sell WR at a later date.

As for the rest of this thread:
Fully: stop posting daft comments about how Cas can start building the stadium tomorrow. It just incites the off topic posts.
Wakefield fans: Stop jumping on everything he says.

This thread is about the proposed stadium at GLASSHOUGHTON not NEWMARKET too so keep on topic.

Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:27 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

Fully: stop posting daft comments
[/color]

Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:31 pm  

Fully wrote:

But we can build it tomorrow? There is nothing false with that statement in any sense. We can start digging and start laying bricks. We wouldn't get very far in building something looking like a stadium but nonetheless we can start tomorrow because we have full planning permission. Simples really.

As for 5 weeks, I'm not sure where that would come from? My understanding is that irrespective of the type of planning, they all usually take the same amount of time although admittedly I'd guess that Outline PP takes much longer than Full PP to go through.

But as I was ridiculed on the other thread on the VT for, I would guess that this is based on everything being a best-cae scenario. I still believe that several conditions would have to be met and who knows what the Gov't will do if it does get the green light.

Oh i see you!!! should have used the preface "hypothetically" because only in a mad world would that be any basis to build a stadium.
I think you may have taken leave of your senses, because that is without doubt the most barking mad explanation of a point i have ever read.
If that is how you judge progress i can see why you are so in admiration of all things Dickie!!!
I cannot compete with this level of logic (or lack of it)!!!

Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:32 pm  

Sorry i was already committed to the last one when you posted Gronk!!

Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:33 pm  

Wakefield's ground is a joke. A stand behind the posts with roofing only covering 2/3rd. There are about 8 steel girders with some corregated sheeting on top. Down one side of the ground there is a similar amateurish erection about 30 yards long. If Glover was the rich man he purported to be why didnt he do the job properly. They probably wont get planning permission for the new ground anyway because of all the objections by Leeds City Council Residents.
Doubtful whether Wakefield Met woulld allow two grounds to be built so close to each other. Castleford already have full pllanning permission,Highways would have to be involved to create access from M62. Wakefield may have plans for a new ground but it won't be at Newmarket.

Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:35 pm  

Scabbycat wrote:

Wakefield's ground is a joke. A stand behind the posts with roofing only covering 2/3rd. There are about 8 steel girders with some corregated sheeting on top. Down one side of the ground there is a similar amateurish erection about 30 yards long. If Glover was the rich man he purported to be why didnt he do the job properly. They probably wont get planning permission for the new ground anyway because of all the objections by Leeds City Council Residents.
Doubtful whether Wakefield Met woulld allow two grounds to be built so close to each other. Castleford already have full pllanning permission,Highways would have to be involved to create access from M62. Wakefield may have plans for a new ground but it won't be at Newmarket.

This post has to be a joke, surely?