Re: Ben Cross : Tue May 08, 2012 7:59 pm  

We never were Fully.

Re: Ben Cross : Tue May 08, 2012 10:53 pm  

Tigerade wrote:

We never were Fully.

Not quite half, but yes you are.

Back to Ben Cross - I'd have him at WTW in a heartbeat; he just needs a coach who can do what Shaun Wane appears to be doing with Lauaki at Wigan - keep the mongrel in him but get rid of the indiscipline.

Re: Ben Cross : Wed May 09, 2012 7:14 am  

On a positive about Ben Cross, his fitness levels were pretty good. I'm not sure how much game time he got on Monday, but it seemed as if he was on for the major part of the game.

Re: Ben Cross : Wed May 09, 2012 10:00 pm  

bren2k wrote:

Not quite half, but yes you are.

Back to Ben Cross - I'd have him at WTW in a heartbeat; he just needs a coach who can do what Shaun Wane appears to be doing with Lauaki at Wigan - keep the mongrel in him but get rid of the indiscipline.

No we're not, Bren.

Re: Ben Cross : Thu May 10, 2012 6:10 am  

Fully wrote:

No we're not, Bren.

According to the article in league express round the time of the signing wakey are paying around the 60% mark of his wages.

Re: Ben Cross : Thu May 10, 2012 6:20 am  

2/3 = 66%. Just because he doesn't like getting up at 6 in the morning for the new earlier training regime Millward has introduced at Tigers this year. Pity really.