Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:46 pm  

The RFL will provide kit directives detailing which kit each team and the match officials shall wear at each Match (other than rounds of the Challenge Cup prior to Round 4) and each Club shall comply with such directives. In general the home team will wear its principle kit and the away team shall be directed to wear the kit which best distinguishes the two teams. In both cases this may include the RFL directing that alternative shorts and or socks are worn. Where otherwise unavoidable a home team may be instructed to wear its alternative kit at home. Notwithstanding the provisions of B1.24, where the Colours of the visiting Club clash with that of the home Club (and the Match Commissioner shall be the final arbiter of this), the visiting Club must change into such alternative strip or parts of strip as the Match Commissioner may direct. To ensure that this Rule can be complied with the visiting Club must bring two different sets of strip to the Match. http://rfllive.dyndns.org/~rflmedia/doc ... on%20B.pdf By the RFL's own rules, Hudds should have wear their home kit as it wouldn't have clashed with Cas. Cas are at fault for not bringing their 2nd kit.

The RFL will provide kit directives detailing which kit each team and the match officials shall wear at each Match (other than rounds of the Challenge Cup prior to Round 4) and each Club shall comply with such directives. In general the home team will wear its principle kit and the away team shall be directed to wear the kit which best distinguishes the two teams. In both cases this may include the RFL directing that alternative shorts and or socks are worn. Where otherwise unavoidable a home team may be instructed to wear its alternative kit at home. Notwithstanding the provisions of B1.24, where the Colours of the visiting Club clash with that of the home Club (and the Match Commissioner shall be the final arbiter of this), the visiting Club must change into such alternative strip or parts of strip as the Match Commissioner may direct. To ensure that this Rule can be complied with the visiting Club must bring two different sets of strip to the Match. http://rfllive.dyndns.org/~rflmedia/doc ... on%20B.pdf By the RFL's own rules, Hudds should have wear their home kit as it wouldn't have clashed with Cas. Cas are at fault for not bringing their 2nd kit.

Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:47 pm  

Kippaxer wrote:

True. I'm Guessing Hudds response will have been it's not our fault, we're staying as we are.

Somebody owes the old dear a big bag of Werthers Originals, be interesting to see if that's Huddersfield, Cas or the RFL.

More like a very large box of chocolates and flowers

Hilda is a LEGEND

Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm  

Georgie Best on a Bloomer wrote: Oh dear!. According to this http://bcafc.livewwware.co.uk/viewtopic ... &p=1010562 The match commissioner says it's OUR fault This one's going to run and run I think. You shouldn't believe everything that you read on a fourm. Looks more like Hudds wanted to play in away strip, rfl said yes but forgot to inform Castleford. Do the Exiles have a red and white alternative strip?

Georgie Best on a Bloomer wrote: Oh dear!. According to this http://bcafc.livewwware.co.uk/viewtopic ... &p=1010562 The match commissioner says it's OUR fault This one's going to run and run I think. You shouldn't believe everything that you read on a fourm. Looks more like Hudds wanted to play in away strip, rfl said yes but forgot to inform Castleford. Do the Exiles have a red and white alternative strip?

Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 9:56 pm  

I would have made both teams play in the kit they brought with them. Fair for boths teams that way.

Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:01 pm  

Join the appreciation for Hilda on facebook, someone set up a page while the game was on. http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/pag ... 1244490712

Join the appreciation for Hilda on facebook, someone set up a page while the game was on. http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/pag ... 1244490712

Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:12 pm  

Its Cas thats at fault they were the away team they should have brought 2 kits with them in case the kit they were wearing clashed with the home teams kit,i hope this clears it up for you fully.

Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:18 pm  

BOYD2 wrote:

Its Cas thats at fault they were the away team they should have brought 2 kits with them in case the kit they were wearing clashed with the home teams kit,i hope this clears it up for you fully.

Not as easy as that as I've said.

The facts will come out. The rules state as I've posted that the home team should wear their home kit.

Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:20 pm  

BOYD2 wrote:

Its Cas thats at fault they were the away team they should have brought 2 kits with them in case the kit they were wearing clashed with the home teams kit,i hope this clears it up for you fully.

Wrong, try reading through the RFL website. It was a home game for the giants and they were down to play in the home strip. We didn't need to bring 2 kits at all and I don't think any team does this, they know in advance that if they clash or not.

Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:27 pm  

You were soundly beaten on the feild and you will be soundly beaten on this,one last time ITS UP TO THE AWAY TEAM TO CHANGE THERE JERSEY IN THE CASE OF A CLASH OF COLOUR.

Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:33 pm  

BOYD2 wrote:

You were soundly beaten on the feild and you will be soundly beaten on this,one last time ITS UP TO THE AWAY TEAM TO CHANGE THERE JERSEY IN THE CASE OF A CLASH OF COLOUR.

It's also the responsibility of the home club to wear their home kit unless directed by the Match Commissioner to switch shorts/socks. In the case, there's a full clash then the home club can wear their alternative kit.

Read the paragraphs quoted from the operational rules at the top of the page.