Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Tue Jul 13, 2010 1:28 pm  

newgroundb4cas wrote:

Wakey

No pool, every amateur club is a disgrace in terms of club house and facilities, my club included, no funding for anything, a total and utter disgrace.

I personally find that comment very offensive, ive played at Crigglestone for 10 years and there are countless people who work really hard up there to keep the club going. The facilities up there are second to non.

The facilities for alot of the amature clubs in wakefield are not bad at all, Croftons got brill facitlites, as have Walton, Stanley, Sharlston.

Normanton, Westgate and Eastmoor have got decent facilities and there are people who work endlessly to keep the clubs up to scratch, i think you are doing them a great injustice!!

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Tue Jul 13, 2010 4:30 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

Probably architects designs and ready to submit for full planning permission

i would love to think that was going to be the case but the thing that makes me think its not is that i have no idea where the club is going to get the 180K + from to put in for the full planing permission. i think it is more likely to be the case that RW will show us 3 possible designes that we will choose from to put in for PP, so more delays i think will be the order of the day. but i hope i am wrong and you are right.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:20 pm  

Can't see why we don't knock our heads together and share a ground at the neutral location which is Newmarket.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:27 pm  

Lupset_Airport wrote:

Can't see why we don't knock our heads together and share a ground at the neutral location which is Newmarket.

What happening with Newmarket, Is it going to the secretary of state ?

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:29 pm  

Speedy wrote:

What happening with Newmarket, Is it going to the secretary of state ?

Been put back until September for Planning meeting - just like Cas all over again.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Tue Jul 13, 2010 8:09 pm  

Fully wrote: Been put back until September for Planning meeting - just like Cas all over again. I could be wrong here and im sure the polecats will pounce, but if it has to go to a public enquiry, then the secretary of state has to be involved, and rarely does planning permission be given, It may allow for sports purposes the building of a stadium, depending on many factors, but i doubt anything else. Im sure the Nimby's are banging their drums as we speak, so its not going to be plain sailing. The highways Agency arent happy yet either " intresting Reading, If you can be Arsed Especially from Leeds Council in section 5 Oooer the dreaded otters section 8 statutory responses Ecology

Fully wrote: Been put back until September for Planning meeting - just like Cas all over again. I could be wrong here and im sure the polecats will pounce, but if it has to go to a public enquiry, then the secretary of state has to be involved, and rarely does planning permission be given, It may allow for sports purposes the building of a stadium, depending on many factors, but i doubt anything else. Im sure the Nimby's are banging their drums as we speak, so its not going to be plain sailing. The highways Agency arent happy yet either " intresting Reading, If you can be Arsed Especially from Leeds Council in section 5 Oooer the dreaded otters section 8 statutory responses Ecology

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:02 am  

Lupset_Airport wrote:

Can't see why we don't knock our heads together and share a ground at the neutral location which is Newmarket.

because its in castleford best interest to play in glasshoughton.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:24 am  

pyeman wrote:

because its in castleford best interest to play in glasshoughton.

Because it's the best location - any club would be stupid to reject that.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:32 am  

Fully wrote:

Because it's the best location - any club would be stupid to reject that.

Certainly, would have the best transport links of any rl stadium in the country, with all the nearby entertainment it will be the biggest draw for families and it already had thousands of free car parking spaces.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:48 am  

Chairman Miaow wrote:

...sensible post...

That's the most sensible and realistic post I've seen on this subject for yonks.