Re: Wakey Express- Groundshare : Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:17 pm  

marshman wrote:

Don't you just hate it when people do that, making up stuff to suit their own argument.

Ah nice one tb, you spotted it before me. Don't you just hate it when people make stuff up to suit their own argument!

But ffs Wakey fans, don't come on here spouting blatant lies to make your progression sound better than it really is and even more importantly, better than our own progression. Propaganda is used in wars, not stadium building, so keep all that crap that some of you have in your heads that you seem to think is "the truth" and leave it there. Stop coming on here or telling the world that you know a guy in India who has the contract to hand mould the bricks that will be used to build your stadium. We're both in need of the stadiums and we're both in the same boat. It's not a competition between us to win the one and only place left in SL. I don't understand how any Cas or Wakey fan can begrudge the other anything when we are so similar in needs right now. For me it's similar to when we beat Widnes in the GF. I'll always sympathise with them because they are as big a club as us and we could have so easily been in their position right now. So get on with doing all you can for your clubs and supporting your team and feck right off with all this crap that seems to be flooding our boards, especially the crap that is totally untrue!

What wakey fans, there is only the one what has mentioned anything, on the other hand if you care to go on the Wakey board you will see who is spouting all the crap squire, gasbag,riggins,bigalf, and ambernotyeller to name but a few and not very pleasant with it either, we have made our statement of intent, I suggest your club do the same and get about your business of building your new stadium instead of trying to pick holes in the statement read out at our game yesterday.

Re: Wakey Express- Groundshare : Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:27 pm  

vastman wrote:

I'm not sure about the exact detail of this but Wakey have an advantage on this groundshare thing, if you can call losing your home ground an advantage . Again I'm not totally sure about this and may be wording it wrongly. From what I have heard, because Oakwell is only six mile from BV the RFL bylaws will consider it to still be a homeground and we could actually play there permanently if required at no detriment to our franchise. If Cas to move any existing stadium they will move out of there own district area and will no longer be Cas and lose a large number of franchise points.

So basically Wakey would get a franchise at Oakwell but Cas would not as there is no viable groundshare close enough. Again I may be wrong but it's what I've heard.

So Oakwell can be considered Wakefield's home ground when it isn't even in the same County?

Re: Good Luck with GH : Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:27 pm  

Cas to make a statement tomorrow.

Re: Good Luck with GH : Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:29 pm  

mrpurfect wrote: Cas to make a statement tomorrow. http://www.castigers.com/article.php?id=935

mrpurfect wrote: Cas to make a statement tomorrow. http://www.castigers.com/article.php?id=935

Re: Wakey Express- Groundshare : Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:30 pm  

chissitt wrote:

:shock: What wakey fans, there is only the one what has mentioned anything, on the other hand if you care to go on the Wakey board you will see who is spouting all the crap squire, gasbag,riggins,bigalf, and ambernotyeller to name but a few and not very pleasant with it either, we have made our statement of intent, I suggest your club do the same and get about your business of building your new stadium instead of trying to pick holes in the statement read out at our game yesterday.

Awwwww you mentioned me again

I guess over on the Wakey forum, making valid points to counter argue your blatant lies is considered trolling then? ok, good to know

Re: Wakey Express- Groundshare : Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:42 pm  

Chissitt trust me there are as many Wakie trolls as Cas trolls but it is an open forum so that's how it goes.

As for picking holes in the statement, that's what debating is all about and you cant tell me you really think the council have said they will only back NM and not GH as is intimated in the statement.

Time will tell but i believe as much that comes out from both clubs as i do when MPs talk in the run up to an election

[tb]

Re: Wakey Express- Groundshare : Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:58 pm  

Bonzo wrote:

So Oakwell can be considered Wakefield's home ground when it isn't even in the same County?

? Has Barnsley upped sticks and left Yorkshire then?

Re: Wakey Express- Groundshare : Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:02 pm  

Think he meant South Yorkshire as opposed to West Yorkshire, judging by how they speak thou definitely

Re: Wakey Express- Groundshare : Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:03 pm  

tb wrote:

? Has Barnsley upped sticks and left Yorkshire then?

That would be nice!

Re: Wakey Express- Groundshare : Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:17 pm  

Therailwayendisuponus. wrote:

That would be nice!

Being both a Trinity and a Barnsley fan I take offense to the above.
I can think of another sporting group Yorkshire can do without. One who had "fans" taken away in riot vans this weekend.

As was said on the Wakefield forum;

"People in Glasshoughton shouldn't throw stones."