Re: jake webster. : Mon Jun 04, 2012 3:22 pm
deeHell wrote: Not trolling I’m just setting the record straight from what 007 has said. Did you bother to read past my post? Yes. And no one has any written evidence to support their points regarding the finances of WTW's ground whatsoever...but then you decided to launch back into points about GH, of which you have no clue about either. Aside from that, your point about Glasshoughton land is incorrect given that the land has already been signed over to us. http://www.castigers.com/article.php?id=942 So...I suggest once more, on behalf of the Moderators that are largely and probably otherwise engaged, that this thread returns back to the subject matter of...Jake Webster. |
deeHell wrote: Not trolling I’m just setting the record straight from what 007 has said. Did you bother to read past my post? Yes. And no one has any written evidence to support their points regarding the finances of WTW's ground whatsoever...but then you decided to launch back into points about GH, of which you have no clue about either. Aside from that, your point about Glasshoughton land is incorrect given that the land has already been signed over to us. http://www.castigers.com/article.php?id=942 So...I suggest once more, on behalf of the Moderators that are largely and probably otherwise engaged, that this thread returns back to the subject matter of...Jake Webster. |
|