Re: i would rather have mathers back : Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:44 am  

dodger666 wrote:

for any cas fans who agree with this thread here are the stats of both players after 2 games


owen mathers
Position 1 1
Shirt number 1 1
Appearances 2 2
Tries 3 1
Try assists 0 1
Goals 0 0
Drop Goals 0 0
Meters 297 209
Carries 49 30
Tackles 4 4
Offloads 1 0
Attacking Kicks 2 0
Runs from dummy half 11 3
Tackle Busts 8 4
Marker tackles 0 0
Clean Breaks 2 1
Forty twenty 0 0
Kicks in general play 2 0
Missed goals 0 0
Missed tackles 0 2
Errors 4 3
Penalties 0 1
Red cards 0 0
Yellow cards 0 0

Impressive but over the common that will just be conjecture. Nice to see Owen doing better than our ex 2nd best player pmsl

Open question , Is that NGBC character alright in the head ? I mean seriously, is he ok ????

Re: i would rather have mathers back : Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:57 am  

forrard wrote:

Impressive but over the common that will just be conjecture. Nice to see Owen doing better than our ex 2nd best player pmsl

Open question , Is that NGBC character alright in the head ? I mean seriously, is he ok ????

He's a bit eccentric, aye.

Good to see young Owen holding his own against an old-stager like Mathers; I'm sure he'll have a decent season if he continues in the same vein.

Interesting thing about stats though - according to Clarkey on Boots N All this week, WTW are 4th in the table of 'clean breaks' made after 2 rounds of SL; breaks are one of his KPI's for SL teams this season, and yet we're 1 from 2. Probably a bit early therefore to read too much into stats, but good on the lad - he's made a bright start.

Re: i would rather have mathers back : Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:13 pm  

bren2k wrote:

He's a bit eccentric, aye.

Good to see young Owen holding his own against an old-stager like Mathers; I'm sure he'll have a decent season if he continues in the same vein.

Interesting thing about stats though - according to Clarkey on Boots N All this week, WTW are 4th in the table of 'clean breaks' made after 2 rounds of SL; breaks are one of his KPI's for SL teams this season, and yet we're 1 from 2. Probably a bit early therefore to read too much into stats, but good on the lad - he's made a bright start.

Careful bren , this could be seen as trolling by the more paranoid amongst your lot, do you know its not on to have a little jest on your forum ? very sensitive they are

Re: i would rather have mathers back : Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:54 pm  

forrard wrote:

Careful bren , this could be seen as trolling by the more paranoid amongst your lot, do you know its not on to have a little jest on your forum ? very sensitive they are

Nah - this is, believe it or not, a grown-up discussion about RL; who'da thunk it?!

Re: i would rather have mathers back : Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:24 pm  

bren2k wrote:

Nah - this is, believe it or not, a grown-up discussion about RL; who'da thunk it?!

Certainly not 'wildthing' thunking is not his forte, i mean he cant lie if hes thunking and of course no movement in the trouser department ..................................

Re: i would rather have mathers back : Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:52 pm  

forrard wrote:

Certainly not 'wildthing' thunking is not his forte, i mean he cant lie if hes thunking and of course no movement in the trouser department ..................................

I haven't got a clue what any of that means; is it part of the ongoing sensible discussion, or have you changed your mind about that?

Re: i would rather have mathers back : Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:46 pm  

bren2k wrote:

I haven't got a clue what any of that means; is it part of the ongoing sensible discussion, or have you changed your mind about that?

Its just your moderator getting a little stiffy because he calls me a name of someone I know better than most, and the clown thinks I am that person, along with the cas resident mule.

Back on topic , Mathers is a liability and you will see that to your cost sooner or later.