Re: Would you ground share? : Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:03 am  

bren2k wrote:

Which proves that your original out of context mis-quote was, at best, an act of childish mischief designed to play to the gallery, or at worst, a dishonest attempt to highlight a point that I never made in the first place.

You can apologise whenever you feel ready.

Yeah ok!

bren2k wrote:

Personally I wouldn't mind sharing, on the proviso that following each Cas game, some kind of antibacterial wipe was provided at each seat, just to be on the safe side.

Re: Would you ground share? : Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:21 am  

kinleycat wrote:

The merger thing would be a real concern for me too, as for wakey dismissing it, that was at gh i think.
I would prefer for both clubs to have separate grounds and 100% maintain their own identities, however the clock is ticking and we are still not in either new ground and the rfl have laid down a new factor in this lot of franchises, we arent guaranteed three years if our grounds aren't moving forward.
If both clubs are moving forward, no problem, if not sufficiently for the rfl both clubs could have real problems.

how about:
e) when rangi chase becomes english?

I agree with you kinleycat. It is up to both clubs to get their respective fingers out because when the licence applications come round next time, there could be a couple of championship clubs with strong cases and the RFL will be looking at both of us if our plans have not come to fruition again.

Re: Would you ground share? : Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:26 am  

bigalf wrote:

Yeah ok!

A tongue in cheek comment on a thread that has little merit other than to provoke exactly that type of response.

It has no bearing on your original dishonest use of part of a quote from an unrelated thread.

Re: Would you ground share? : Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:28 am  

BostonSpaTiger wrote:

I agree with you kinleycat. It is up to both clubs to get their respective fingers out because when the licence applications come round next time, there could be a couple of championship clubs with strong cases and the RFL will be looking at both of us if our plans have not come to fruition again.

TBH mate, i think if we don't "pull our fingers out" it wont take three years to be staring down the barrels, the rfl have made that quite clear this time around.

Re: Would you ground share? : Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:31 am  

bren2k wrote:

A tongue in cheek comment on a thread that has little merit other than to provoke exactly that type of response.

It has no bearing on your original dishonest use of part of a quote from an unrelated thread.

Oi!!!

Re: Would you ground share? : Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:05 am  

bren2k wrote:

A tongue in cheek comment on a thread that has little merit other than to provoke exactly that type of response.

It has no bearing on your original dishonest use of part of a quote from an unrelated thread.

By gum! Make sure you don't get a nose bleed up there on your horse.

Back on topic - I think either club would be daft not to share a ground until their own was completed.

Re: Would you ground share? : Mon Oct 10, 2011 12:49 pm  

All small minded drivel aside and without any point scoring, I am not into petty rivalries I want to watch my team have the best advantage commercially, facilities and in infrastructure terms, whatever that takes:

If there was a completed stadium within the catchment area I think both clubs would be idiots not to consider it and use that to safeguard their future.
From a business perspective looking at the infrastructure, tourism and sustainability elements, in my mind the Glasshoughton development is a prime site for that development, but that’s my own opinion.

A stadium does not make the club and the fans - in fact the opposite; fans can make a stadium and support and therefore a club.

Re: Would you ground share? : Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:47 pm  

bigalf wrote:

By gum! Make sure you don't get a nose bleed up there on your horse.

Back on topic - I think either club would be daft not to share a ground until there own was completed.

Don't worry, I'm quite comfortable up here on the moral high ground.

Back on topic - you're a wazzock.

Re: Would you ground share? : Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:14 pm  

bren2k wrote:

Don't worry, I'm quite comfortabe up here on the moral high ground.

Back on topic - you're a wazzock.

Re: Would you ground share? : Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:23 pm  

bren2k wrote:

Don't worry, I'm quite comfortable up here on the moral high ground.

Back on topic - you're a wazzock.

Are you Chissits' love child?