Re: That challenge : Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:26 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

"As for the girl friend thing, again, this is something that works a lot of the time because if you were in the position of being late in a pregnancy and people were calling for the father to be thrown in jail/deported I'd assume that would get to you.

On the legal stuff: I see, thanks.

On the quoted bit, by "charged" I erroneously assumed you meant by the RFL judiciary. Calls for him to be jailed or deported are OTT, so yes, that would no doubt be upsetting.

Re: That challenge : Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:21 pm  

https://mobile.twitter.com/#!/Cal_Stran ... 72?photo=1

https://mobile.twitter.com/#!/Cal_Stran ... 72?photo=1

Re: That challenge : Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:30 pm  

Catalancs wrote: https://mobile.twitter.com/#!/Cal_Strangward/status/192087777398095872?photo=1 https://twitter.com/#!/cal_strangward That link is the working one He's a sad, sad individual though.

Catalancs wrote: https://mobile.twitter.com/#!/Cal_Strangward/status/192087777398095872?photo=1 https://twitter.com/#!/cal_strangward That link is the working one He's a sad, sad individual though.

Re: That challenge : Tue Apr 17, 2012 5:00 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

https://twitter.com/#!/cal_strangward

That link is the working one

He's a sad, sad individual though.

Ahhh the result of the "tackle" you seemed to think was fair at the time... Changed your view, or still think it was legit?

Re: That challenge : Tue Apr 17, 2012 5:54 pm  

Gronk! wrote: Catalancs wrote: https://mobile.twitter.com/#!/Cal_Strangward/status/192087777398095872?photo=1 https://twitter.com/#!/cal_strangward That link is the working one He's a sad, sad individual though. That's awfully rich, and possibly libellous.

Gronk! wrote: Catalancs wrote: https://mobile.twitter.com/#!/Cal_Strangward/status/192087777398095872?photo=1 https://twitter.com/#!/cal_strangward That link is the working one He's a sad, sad individual though. That's awfully rich, and possibly libellous.

Re: That challenge : Tue Apr 17, 2012 5:56 pm  

3 games for a "reckless" challenge, that's strange the experts on the VT were telling us we were wrong for calling it that and it was CLEARLY deliberate!

Re: That challenge : Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:19 pm  

3 Matches - I bet he doesn't appeal

Re: That challenge : Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:33 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

So you're a psychologist?

Barrie & Terry both called it a "great shot" on air.

Ah, so you know nothing about Rugby League, got it.

A psychologist I am not but, I have deduced you are the cock of the forum and No longer shall I mess with you..... good day oh wise one








Feck me what a weapon.......

Re: That challenge : Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:14 pm  

It's very sad when you see a keyboard warriors like Gunk taking such satisfaction in defending such a dangerous tackle as Rangi's

Re: That challenge : Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:19 pm  

The Chin's Back wrote:

satisfaction in defending such a dangerous tackle as Rangi's

You mean after Cas fans have proven to be right in saying it was reckless and not intentional.

In fact if you go back at least 2 people said 3 games and a fine....so spot on

Of course you and all the idiots on the VT know more than the RFL, no seriously of course you do.

It's turned into a witch hunt and to me, shows why RL is a minority sport - the fans.