kinleycat wrote:
Completely agree Dave and certainly not taken as a dig.
Like i pointed out it was a point of pedantry, an observation on the spin that someone can put on something to make it credible and creditable.
The OP was about a comment made in answer to the article in Lge Exp i think about Cas being lumped in with all us other roustabouts, which i think was ungenerous, but equally without Mr Fulton's support (as indicated my Mr Gill) that may be a different story.
Like i said reletive tranquility is better than chaos every couple of years so good on Cas, your boat is more seaworthy than ours.
I think to lump Cas into that category was a little harsh, but maybe in correct context it isn't far wrong. We are cash strapped, and certainly we have financial boundaries simlar to Wakefield and Bradford - the difference being, which hasn't been stated in the article, that we have always stayed within those constraits (as far as I'm aware)
We have people in place that are making the best of what we have, it's just unfortunate that sports clubs often attract people with champagne lifestyles, and we are very much a lemonade sport (at our level anyway)
