Re: Can Rugby league look any more corrupt. : Thu Aug 02, 2012 10:28 pm  

Do you really think that all the Representatives of all the Clubs would be in favour of this .I just cannot believe it .

Re: Can Rugby league look any more corrupt. : Thu Aug 02, 2012 10:37 pm  

I don't believe I will be attending any bulls away games from now on.

Depends on whether there is more information to come and what the information says.

[Wildthing]

Re: Can Rugby league look any more corrupt. : Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:26 am  

johnny freeman fan club wrote:

Do you really think that all the Representatives of all the Clubs would be in favour of this .I just cannot believe it .

Totally agree. I really don't believe that either.

Re: Can Rugby league look any more corrupt. : Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:54 am  

Its a joke, they didnt lift a finger to help the polecats, blackpool, widnes, whitehaven, This just goes to show how bent this is becoming, how can the RFL own a ground and a team? Now some will say its SLE, i know and everyone knows this is round spherical objects (bollox)
Its the RFL who are dictating what happens, how can Wood be incharge of both RFL and SLE when they are supposed to be independant,

I give up, its more fixed than wrestling was on a satuday afternoon with Dikie Davies

Bent and Rotten to the Core

Re: Can Rugby league look any more corrupt. : Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:59 am  

As I said on one of the post during the arguments about the ground. The smaller clubs need to stand together, this is a clear sign that there are fasionable and unfashionable clubs. Like someone said the smaller clubs are basically been forced out of business having to provide stadiums they can't afford. The super league want to reduce the size of the league and stick to the elite. I said during the last licences that the chapionship seems more honest in rugby terms and now sort of wish we had gone down. Playing in "our" iconic traditional grounds in a lower league where we would be very competative seems appealing today.

Not sure if Cas fans feel the same way but it isn't about rugby this league.

Re: Can Rugby league look any more corrupt. : Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:31 am  

Speedy wrote:

its more fixed than wrestling was on a satuday afternoon with Dikie Davies

And before him Kent Walton!!

Re: Can Rugby league look any more corrupt. : Fri Aug 03, 2012 4:11 pm  

Dannyboywt wrote:

As I said on one of the post during the arguments about the ground. The smaller clubs need to stand together, this is a clear sign that there are fasionable and unfashionable clubs. Like someone said the smaller clubs are basically been forced out of business having to provide stadiums they can't afford. The super league want to reduce the size of the league and stick to the elite. I said during the last licences that the chapionship seems more honest in rugby terms and now sort of wish we had gone down. Playing in "our" iconic traditional grounds in a lower league where we would be very competative seems appealing today.

Not sure if Cas fans feel the same way but it isn't about rugby this league.

Being A Fax fan I and many others would rather stay in the Championship right Now as it is A very competative league with A good standard of proper RL of course being A so called big fish in A small pond is very nice place to be. I wish you all the best up their in the promised land, with the way things are i'm glad we are out of it !

Re: Can Rugby league look any more corrupt. : Fri Aug 03, 2012 4:32 pm  

This is shame full but after going to the meet directors meeting the other week and listning to Steve Ferris i 100 percent sure that Cas voted for this it is in our intrest for the bulls to be in SL because if they go some other club will go aswell which will proberlly be us so i believe some teams have had no choice but to suport the Bulls.

Re: Can Rugby league look any more corrupt. : Sat Aug 04, 2012 6:45 am  

hard team to follow wrote:

This is shame full but after going to the meet directors meeting the other week and listning to Steve Ferris i 100 percent sure that Cas voted for this it is in our intrest for the bulls to be in SL because if they go some other club will go aswell which will proberlly be us so i believe some teams have had no choice but to suport the Bulls.

In effect the RFL cannot kick anyone out of SL as long as we keep our heads above water. If SL goes down to 12 clubs this will be done without having to choose the weakest application (ie Franchising). A self-culling if you like.

My prediction - Bulls will go down to Championship 1 and we will have a 13 team SL next year then P & R will be back for 2015.

[tb]

Re: Can Rugby league look any more corrupt. : Sat Aug 04, 2012 3:06 pm  

johnny freeman fan club wrote:

Do you really think that all the Representatives of all the Clubs would be in favour of this .I just cannot believe it .

SLE has 15 shareholders. The 14 SL clubs and the RFL. According to Gary Hetherington (yes, I know, but he was actually at the meeting) there was unanimous support for a bid to buy Bradford