Re: Johnny Walker : Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:06 pm  

Well looking here he isn't registered on either the UK or Overseas Agent List. I know that was published last year but he was supposedly operating last year as well.

Well looking here he isn't registered on either the UK or Overseas Agent List. I know that was published last year but he was supposedly operating last year as well.

Re: Johnny Walker : Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:15 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

The same unlicensed agent has also been involved in the illegal contract signing of Joe Arundel to Hull.

The club should report both Hull and said "agent" for illegal transfer activity.

Proof? Potentially libelous. You should have more sense after you were spouting off at others about suing them the other day.

Re: Johnny Walker : Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:43 pm  

i do hope joe does stay with the tigers also great news if walker has resigned looked to be getting back to his best against hull

Re: Johnny Walker : Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:47 pm  

Fully wrote:

Proof? Potentially libelous. You should have more sense after you were spouting off at others about suing them the other day.

Arundel has [supposedly] signed for Hull
The anti tampering deadline isn't for months
His agent is unlicensed per the list in the post above yours

ergo, if Joe has indeed signed for Hull, that is illegal transfer activity.

Re: Johnny Walker : Wed Mar 28, 2012 10:01 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

Arundel has [supposedly] signed for Hull
The anti tampering deadline isn't for months
His agent is unlicensed per the list in the post above yours

ergo, if Joe has indeed signed for Hull, that is illegal transfer activity.

That's a slightly different statement to this:

Gronk! wrote:

The same unlicensed agent has also been involved in the illegal contract signing of Joe Arundel to Hull.

One is supposition, the other is a statement of fact. To quote your own words "if you do have the proof then bring it on, other wise you sir are in a world of trouble."

Re: Johnny Walker : Wed Mar 28, 2012 10:04 pm  

RebelRebel wrote:

One is supposition, the other is a statement of fact. To quote your own words "if you do have the proof then bring it on, other wise you sir are in a world of trouble."

Well, I could name my source but that wouldn't be a wise thing to do with the line of work he's in, so just for you I'll edit the original post.

Re: Johnny Walker : Wed Mar 28, 2012 10:05 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

Well, I could name my source but that wouldn't be a wise thing to do with the line of work he's in, so just for you I'll edit the original post.

Casforum doesn't count.

Re: Johnny Walker : Wed Mar 28, 2012 10:10 pm  

Fully wrote:

Casforum doesn't count.

Not there

If it was them I'd freely mention it

Re: Johnny Walker : Wed Mar 28, 2012 10:15 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

just for you I'll edit the original post.

Don't do it on my account, mate. I won't be stumping up for your legal fees. Still, after the millions you get from Vastman, footing this bill won't be much of a problem, will it?

Now where were we/you? Johnny Walker... Everyone glad he's (allegedly) re-signed?

Re: Johnny Walker : Wed Mar 28, 2012 10:19 pm  

RebelRebel wrote:

Now where were we/you? Johnny Walker... Everyone glad he's (allegedly) re-signed?

Yes

Wouldn't mind if they signed his brother from Huddersfield either.