Re: Martin Aspinwall : Thu Nov 10, 2011 9:18 pm  

Bonzo wrote:

I'd have preferred it if we'd kept hold of him. He put in some very strong performances later in the season.

This. A direct runner, works his backside off for the club. An all-round decent player. Apprehensive turned to pleased we signed him really.

Re: Martin Aspinwall : Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:13 pm  

bren2k wrote:

I give it another week before the 'Gentle out' brigade is formed; they're already baying for Bomber's blood.

how wrong can you be?

some fans are not pleased but that is typical of hull fans, too many believe silly rumours on these boards, but not one poster has bayed fro bombers blood

Re: Martin Aspinwall : Fri Nov 11, 2011 4:41 pm  

tttiger wrote:

he was average at best and didnt offer the team as much as young oliver holmes or john davis imo. However he had problems in his personal life last year , so may come good if these are behind him.

I think he was OK, but I would prefer to see 2 lads at the start of their career every week playing at a club they developed with, as opposed to Aspi. Decent bloke and a decent player, but not the future like the 2 people mentioned above - they ARE the future.