G.Price Fan Club wrote:
Trolling? - Got to spice up this board some how, it's as dead as on here.
The reason why it's dead is because most times that someone seems to write something positive about the club, there is a huge plethora of trolling, negative comment from people who just rehash the same old rubbish and all that sort of tripe.
Another reason is that when some of us try to have a go back, we get (not from the mods) a load of bile about having a childish set-to.
It seems that there isn't much you can say without people deliberately trying to talk it down, the Tesco comment in your original post being a prime example. The original purpose of this thread was to find out some information, not to be subjected to your third-rate spin-doctoring.
You said: "but as other
sites already have FPP for such a development" and then you said in your next post "Bridge Street was
the one that I can recall. You will now come back with some pathetic response about how I'm being too sensitive, how you've got more idea about the planning process than I'll ever know, how you can't tell us your sources because it's privileged information, and then you'll make up some pathetic little titbit of misinformation to get things running again.
That's how it works, and how it's worked on here for a long time now regarding stadium posts.
So, if you've some substantiated information, share it by all means, good or bad. If it's only your opinion, then to be honest, go and share it with someone who's thick enough to believe that what you say is 100% true.
