Re: 3 Years?? : Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:43 pm  

I don't think this equation has changed much - Wakey's unfortunate plight eased our worries this time - but it was simple last time around and will be simple again now: (Apologies for words in CAPS, but I just want to avoid a plethora of moaning, trolling and telling me I am a clown - its my opinion)

There is unlikely to be enough investment, will and corporate funding and partners to sustain 2 multi million pound single use minority sports stadia within a few miles of each other. IN MY OPINION ONLY - that is a fact.

So, given that assumption on MY PART - It has been the same for the last 4 years - whoever seals the deal, delivers the plans and pours their concrete first secures the future, WHICHEVER club does that first in essence sinks the others battleship IN MY VIEW.
Stands to reason to me, the business challenge for Cas, and we seem to have more of our heads screwed on these days and be managing our departments like a business, is to make it happen, anything less and I think we will get what we deserve.

These views are mine and my opinions only, I don't know anyone, a club insider didn't tell me anything and I am probably wrong!

Re: 3 Years?? : Fri Jul 29, 2011 4:00 pm  

I think that's fair enough, as long as both clubs are trotting on nicely (and I don't see why either can't) I don't see it being a problem for both clubs to deliver new stadia, the threat is there IMO if one or both clubs plans start to go wobbly.