: Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:25 pm  

Legionited wrote:

If he get's done for this, the only person to blame is Ryan McGoldrick.

Sorry, but i've seen it all before, seems whenever we get any measure of success we get an influential player banned for a few matches

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:50 pm  

Tigerpie wrote:

Sorry, but i've seen it all before, seems whenever we get any measure of success we get an influential player banned for a few matches

So are you saying that the powers that be forced Goldy to lead in with the forearm?

If I felt he was innocent, then maybe I'd agree with you, but for me, he was very silly and will be lucky to escape some kind of ban.

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:15 pm  

I saw the incident and it was just after he had the ball stolen one on one. The way i saw it was he ran straight at the bloke who had just taken the ball of him and struck him. This to me suggests Mcgoldrick took objection to been made to look like a fool and went for revenge.

Im a big fan of Mcgoldrick but deserves a ban IMO.

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:19 pm  

Garth wrote:

I saw the incident and it was just after he had the ball stolen one on one. The way i saw it was he ran straight at the bloke who had just taken the ball of him and struck him. This to me suggests Mcgoldrick took objection to been made to look like a fool and went for revenge.

Im a big fan of Mcgoldrick but deserves a ban IMO.

Anyone injured?

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:17 pm  

I think the RFL are gonna have to give him his own parking space soon

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:33 pm  

Tigerpie wrote:

Anyone injured?

That as nothing to do with it.

: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:20 am  

Landy wrote:

That as nothing to do with it.

In theory yes, nothing to do with it. However, in practice, if injury does occur there does tend to be more emphasis put on the incident, and more often than not, a more lengthy ban.

e.g Mr Mason of Hudds, runs in to punch a goons player during a dust up-result no ban, just a fine.

Do you really think if he'd have broken someones jaw he'd have got the same treatment from the disciplinary?

: Tue Apr 07, 2009 2:26 pm  

Its says on the disaplinary action taken 1-4 i am guessing that meams 1-4 match BAN WHY DID HE DO THAT

: Tue Apr 07, 2009 2:34 pm  

browney wrote:

Its says on the disaplinary action taken 1-4 i am guessing that meams 1-4 match BAN WHY DID HE DO THAT

I don't think you're guessing right... 1 to 4 seems to be the grading system, not an automatic number of matches banned.

: Tue Apr 07, 2009 2:37 pm  

ooooooooooooooorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr sorry o feel stupid well anyway still hope he does not get banned