: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:12 pm  

pyeman wrote:

He never blamed the defeat on the grapple tackle if you actualy read his comments, he said he wasnt happy about the amount of times hudds were using the grapple tackle, or do you not expect him to speak up for the safety of his players?

Dont think they do braille on the Hudds board.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 5:48 pm  

Lewis there was only one player on report ,ye ya right it was a Cas player Huby, you should have had another for carying on with trhe touchie but never mind Stevie boy tried his damdest to get you the points, but as they say the rest is history,Good luck at Hull ya gunna need it .

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 8:57 pm  

BOYD2 wrote:

Lewis there was only one player on report ,ye ya right it was a Cas player Huby, you should have had another for carying on with trhe touchie but never mind Stevie boy tried his damdest to get you the points, but as they say the rest is history,Good luck at Hull ya gunna need it .

Time for bed young en!!!

Re: Huby on Report : Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:19 pm  

tropical1 wrote: hi No charge for Craig http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary.php however have a look at how many giants players have had their tackles looked at. TM obviously had a point The RFL found nothing wrong with Huddersfield`s tackling according to the BBC. So what excuses does Matterson want now ???

tropical1 wrote: hi No charge for Craig http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary.php however have a look at how many giants players have had their tackles looked at. TM obviously had a point The RFL found nothing wrong with Huddersfield`s tackling according to the BBC. So what excuses does Matterson want now ???

Re: Huby on Report : Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:22 pm  

Giantscorpio wrote:

The RFL found nothing wrong with Huddersfield`s tackling according to the BBC. So what excuses does Matterson want now ???

They found things wrong with your tackling, they just said a penalty was sufficient.

Re: Huby on Report : Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:36 am  

Giantscorpio wrote:

The RFL found nothing wrong with Huddersfield`s tackling according to the BBC. So what excuses does Matterson want now ???

was there for all to see c*ck head

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:25 pm  

If Materson had not brought this to light as an excuse for loosing you lot would not have even known,so dont come with this evey one saw it crap.

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:31 pm  

there were many complaints regarding tackles from many of the people who were watching the game.

For TM to mention them is not an excuse he is just stating that they appeared to be grapple tackling and the FACT the the rlf looked at 4 tackles proves that on the initial look at the tackle there looked to be something wrong. If there wasn't a hint of a grapple tackle they wouldn't have been looked at as none of the tackles were put on report by Ganson these are tackles the disciplinary board themselves have picked to have a closer look at.

And I bet in Huddersfields next game they will be penalised to death if they carry on to tackle in the same way as they did on saturday as the refs will be looking more carefully at their tackles.