how was that even a try when the leeds player defo knocked on and yet the vidioe looked at the screen once i never saw it go backwards how could of it possible of been a try and what are these bloody touch judges even used for

it was a knock on. not sure how he came to that decision

Interesting spelling of 'video'.

Here we go again.

=#FF0000FYI As Bren2K is alluding to, mcmickeycas is a guy who regulaly posts on this site and suffers with Dyslexia ,so does very well to air his views on here , Irrespective of that, cheap points scoring off [uanyones[/u english skills is pretty low imo


Delboy66(aye of the tigers fanzine)

It was definitely a knock on. The ref said it went back so he played on. Having second thoughts when Leeds scored he referred it to the video ref who obviously ruled no knock-on because he wanted to back the ref's original decision. Everyone in the studio said that it was a knock-on and Wells said the same at half-time. They are not usually unaminous because they like a bit of an argument.
A crucial decision was when Danny Orr was stripped of the ball and didn't get the penalty. Cas were only 4 points behind and the penalty would have put them on the Leeds' 20m line.

Lets not forget Ryan Hall being short for his first try too

They are a law unto themselves and how they didn't see what others saw is strange.

Terrible decision!!

Player touches ball behind line, ball bounces on line. Suggests a forward movement to me.

p.s what a terrible decision....