Re: O/T Phil Veivers : Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:32 pm  

Fully wrote:

No because they've got nothing to put against the loan as collateral, i.e. Wakefield.

For a club that has a short-term financial problem they've not helped themselves in terms of getting ST cash in and shirt sales on the go. Equally, I'm sure sponsors will be really tempted to invest in the situation now (not).

They're in a mighty rut. Unless someone is feeling generous or the council have a change of heart, I fear for them.

The directors know they are insolvent, to sell season tickets etc would be against the law, Not looking good.

Re: O/T Phil Veivers : Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:36 pm  

bigalf wrote:

The directors know they are insolvent, to sell season tickets etc would be against the law, Not looking good.

No it wouldn't. ST's would have gone on sale towards the end of last season when they were still playing games and when cash income was still coming into the club.

Re: O/T Phil Veivers : Sat Dec 15, 2012 6:26 am  

The fact that Salford are not selling ST's is a worry in itself. I thought we were late in putting our package(s) together but with only what 6 weeks to the big kick-off it would look to me that Salford won't be in SL for 2013.

Re: O/T Phil Veivers : Sat Dec 15, 2012 9:24 pm  

Tigerade wrote:

The fact that Salford are not selling ST's is a worry in itself. I thought we were late in putting our package(s) together but with only what 6 weeks to the big kick-off it would look to me that Salford won't be in SL for 2013.

Are Halifax still on stand by ?

Re: O/T Phil Veivers : Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:58 am  

Interesting piece here from LoveRL.com comparing how the RFL run SL to the X Factor. Also refers to us (albeit tonge-in-cheek) as the mighty Castleford:- http://www.loverugbyleague.com/blogpost ... tions.html

Interesting piece here from LoveRL.com comparing how the RFL run SL to the X Factor. Also refers to us (albeit tonge-in-cheek) as the mighty Castleford:- http://www.loverugbyleague.com/blogpost ... tions.html