Re: Wakefield performance : Mon Jan 23, 2012 11:39 am  

Theboyem wrote:

Wakey had five players missing, Raleigh, Wilkes & Mariano injured and Wildie and James both ill. Not sure about the fitness comment either, seeing as Cas finished the stronger in both halves. As you say no point in reading too much into yesterday, its in two weeks time it counts.

Think they finished strong in the first half, second half not - that last try was a lottery win. I just felt over the 80 we did a lot more on the back of better fitness, even Ali looked as lean as I can remember.

That said Cas certainly had a bad day at the office and I doubt Mr Chase will be that quiet in the future.

Re: Wakefield performance : Mon Jan 23, 2012 11:13 pm  

Don't think it was necessarily better fitness. I just think we were knackered from the first 40 with no ball and playing into the wind.

Re: Wakefield performance : Tue Jan 24, 2012 8:51 am  

Fully wrote:

Don't think it was necessarily better fitness. I just think we were knackered from the first 40 with no ball and playing into the wind.

Oh i see, it was God's fault!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (other deities are available!!)

Re: Wakefield performance : Tue Jan 24, 2012 12:16 pm  

kinleycat wrote:

Oh i see, it was God's fault!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (other deities are available!!)

If this is the standard of your contributions, please do go back to the Wakey forum.

Re: Wakefield performance : Tue Jan 24, 2012 12:24 pm  

Fully wrote:

:roll: If this is the standard of your contributions, please do go back to the Wakey forum.

Lighten up!!

Re: Wakefield performance : Tue Jan 24, 2012 12:25 pm  

kinleycat wrote:

:CHILL: Lighten up!!

I will when sensible discussion is created.

Re: Wakefield performance : Tue Jan 24, 2012 12:32 pm  

Fully wrote:

I will when sensible discussion is created.

Ouch!!!