Re: Tadulala : Thu Nov 03, 2011 1:56 pm  

Back to Tadulala (as the subject heading says), unless he is early twenties and a forward, we aren't signing him!

Re: Tadulala : Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:07 pm  

bren2k wrote:

I thought you were bored with that discussion?

I am but it sounded like you had something constructive to share, for a change. Obviously now that you don't we can do this:

Tigerfeet wrote:

Back to Tadulala (as the subject heading says)...

Re: Tadulala : Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:22 pm  

Bonzo wrote:

I am but it sounded like you had something constructive to share, for a change.

If you want to re-hash a discussion from 6 months ago, feel free to delve into the archive of the WTW forum to find all the posts that I and various other people made about the franchise decision at the time it was actual news; I certainly won't be doing it for you.

Re: Tadulala : Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:44 pm  

bren2k wrote:

:lol:

If you want to re-hash a discussion from 6 months ago, feel free to delve into the archive of the WTW forum to find all the posts that I and various other people made about the franchise decision at the time it was actual news; I certainly won't be doing it for you.

Or I could just read through all the obsessive crap you've posted on here in that time - that should be just as interesting.

Re: Tadulala : Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:07 pm  

Bonzo wrote:

Or I could just read through all the obsessive crap you've posted on here in that time - that should be just as interesting.

I agree that my posts often warrant a second or even third reading; with that in mind, knock yourself out.

Re: Tadulala : Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:22 pm  

Even on a pay as you play deal I don't think he would be any better than what we have. Would be a backward step IMO.

Re: Tadulala : Fri Nov 04, 2011 7:21 am  

12 pages about Semi Tadulala? Even allowing for the usual diversionary postings from Wakey fans that seems disproportionate.