Re: Phil Clarke should go! : Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:51 am  

I've no problem with Phil Clarke, always found him supportive of, and complimentary to, Cas......just about the only one in the media who is. God forbid that we be left to the mercy of Hemmings/Stephenson and their bias towards the 'friends of SKY' as manifest by their shameless PR jobs for HKR, Salford, Wakey and anybody who their other pet-coach, Brian Noble, happens to be working for.

Re: Phil Clarke should go! : Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:28 am  

smoking monkey wrote:

I've no problem with Phil Clarke, always found him supportive of, and complimentary to, Cas......just about the only one in the media who is. God forbid that we be left to the mercy of Hemmings/Stephenson and their bias towards the 'friends of SKY' as manifest by their shameless PR jobs for HKR, Salford, Wakey and anybody who their other pet-coach, Brian Noble, happens to be working for.

Stephenson biased towards Wakey, behave
unless its Francis Stephenson then I will agree with you

Re: Phil Clarke should go! : Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:34 am  

he may chat some utter tosh at times, but to be fair (despite his at times frustrating commentery) he does give good insight and at least (unlike eddie) some in game knowledge. He also doesnt refuse fans when they ask to shake his hand, fair plays to the man

Re: Phil Clarke should go! : Tue Sep 21, 2010 10:42 am  

clarke and carney are the best on there imo - stevo talks rubbish to create interest/debate thats what they tell him to do, eddie is the straight guy who sits on the fence and offers both sides of the coin.

Re: Phil Clarke should go! : Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:49 am  

chissitt wrote:

:shock: Stephenson biased towards Wakey, behave
unless its Francis Stephenson then I will agree with you

IMO the gruesome twosome seek to present a disproportionately positive image of all the clubs coached by their almost resident experts ie Morgan,Kear,McRae and Noble.