Ilkley Fax wrote:
I have to disagree about Sutcliffe - if a player who's played for Fax for years and has helped us to get to the final gets replaced by a player with one game on loan then don't think that would do a lot for team moral. A few players surprised me on Sunday in what was our best performance of the season, and did enough to support making only minimal changes to rhe team on Saturday - even if the "talismanic" Keyes was fit - which he won't be. Even though I think Inman will be great for us in future, I'd play Brandon but start with O'brien as Moore was much more effective coming of the bench. Fairbank for Larroyer and McComb for Crooks would be my only changes.
That would be the way to go for me, Sutcliffe is a decent player but it’s not like he’s Sonny Bill Williams in his prime.
On the other hand since were speculating, if I were being ruthless and behind the scenes we’ve signed him up for next year and who ever he displaced wasn’t going to be retained then maybe.
On who starts between Moore and O’Brien Grix started with Moore on Sunday because he’s fairly solid and brought O’Brien and Lannon on to rip into what he judged would be Fev’s bigger tiring pack.
He knew that’s what we would be up against in any case and thought that was the best option and they both had stand out performances in A&D.
Interesting to see if he goes down the same route this week.