Re: Grim at Salford : Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:41 pm  

Wow you totally missed my point. Nevermind.

Enjoy the trophies.

Re: Grim at Salford : Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:45 pm  

littlerich wrote:

Wow you totally missed my point. Nevermind.

Enjoy the trophies.

PMSL ! Solly have got their own little Griff/Gingdong, bless him.

Re: Grim at Salford : Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:54 pm  

Ye tell you what ill just stay negative about RL that's why it's the biggest sport in the world with all the negative jealous comments. NOT!!!

Re: Grim at Salford : Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:02 pm  

Yep, no worries Red League. Moving along .................

Re: Grim at Salford : Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:04 pm  

Come on tell me your point oh great one who seems to know everything but actually gets nothing right.

Re: Grim at Salford : Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:13 pm  

It's a choice between that or teaching double entry bookkeeping to a cabbage I bought today.

I'll take my chance with the cabbage.

Re: Grim at Salford : Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 pm  

In other words you don't have a solid point. Tell you what though you's make a great politician thy talk bullsh!t all the time too.

Re: Grim at Salford : Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:23 pm  

OK, I failed with the cabbage.

You ready?

You wrote:

" Fact is the teams currently in SL are there for the long hall they are all needed ro grow the game of RL, for instance why would the RFL bother to save Salfords skin if we didn't have potential to bring something they want? A successful mancheter RL team the RFL have wanted this for years and now finally after finding a man capable of doing so will not let go for love nor money!"

What I'm saying is that the RFL thought the same way about Crusaders. So, from what you wrote above, replace Salford with Crusaders and three year ago everyone would have said what you've just written. But that's not what happened is it? Crusaders were cast aside like an olive in a Christmas hamper.

If Chairmen like McManus and Hudgell had their way you wouldn't see nurturing loyalty for dust. If they decide to go down to ten there's nothing little old Salford could do, nor could the RFL.

Something has to radically change in SL and in 2014, something WILL radically change, even if you can't stomach the thought.

Re: Grim at Salford : Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:42 pm  

For a start Crusaders weren't cast aside like you say they had the full backing from the RFL they chose to give up their place in super league after their chairman found he bitten off more than he could chew (didnt want to spend any more money) and I know that for a fact as my farther in law is a crusaders supporter group member who knew what was going to happen before the new set of franchises were given out.

And chairmen like McManus you say? Are you speaking of the same Eamon McManus the saints chairman and good friend and business associate of Dr Marwan Kaukash the very same man who was introduced to RL by McManus ye I'm sure he would stab a big business partner in the back like that wouldn't do him any favours at all would. Listen your a clown who likes to spout rumours to get people's backs up and fill their head full of rubbish l, well that doesn't wash with me!

Re: Grim at Salford : Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:48 pm  

littlerich wrote:

OK, I failed with the cabbage.

You ready?

You wrote:

" Fact is the teams currently in SL are there for the long hall they are all needed ro grow the game of RL, for instance why would the RFL bother to save Salfords skin if we didn't have potential to bring something they want? A successful mancheter RL team the RFL have wanted this for years and now finally after finding a man capable of doing so will not let go for love nor money!"

What I'm saying is that the RFL thought the same way about Crusaders. So, from what you wrote above, replace Salford with Crusaders and three year ago everyone would have said what you've just written. But that's not what happened is it? Crusaders were cast aside like an olive in a Christmas hamper.

If Chairmen like McManus and Hudgell had their way you wouldn't see nurturing loyalty for dust. If they decide to go down to ten there's nothing little old Salford could do, nor could the RFL.

Something has to radically change in SL and in 2014, something WILL radically change, even if you can't stomach the thought.

The game would not be sustainable with two Leagues of 10. Nine home games a season plus Challenge Cup games we'd have a season of 5 months maximum.