: Mon Jun 22, 2009 8:37 am
Tony Fax wrote:
I've stopped short at criticising the officials at yesterday's match because it's extremely rare, infact I've never seen it, when watching a match as a neutral on the telly that a ref is biassed towards one team or the other. When a team is getting penalised to death and you hear cries of horror from the "victimised" set of fans in question, I can honestly say that the ref is actually right ... the offending team actually ARE offending. And ... as I've mentioned on another thread ... 2 of our tries were dodgy to say the least ... one try was definitely offside following a kick through and my immediate reaction when Black scored his try was that it was crossing. The touchie thought so too but the ref over ruled him. Don't get me wrong, I was as frustrated as anyone at the high penalty count against us and was spitting chips at the ref, but in calm light of day I don't think we can really blame the ref.
I dont blame the ref whatsoever for our loss, we had many opportunites to win the game.
However
What really riled me, and the people sat around me was the fact that there was at least 7 high tackles in the first 15 minutes that went completely unpunished.
Our offsides that were penalised, in my opinion, were offide, so we should have no issue with that whatsoever, but there were many, many similary positions from Widnes that went completely unpunished.
Said was penalised for not playing the ball correctly, which gave Widnes a penalty some 15 yards away from our line. There were many many other simlar plays of the ball from both Widnes and Halifax throughout the game.
Like I said I dont blame the ref, but what we, as spectators, want is some level of consistency. If he is going to penalise one offence then he has to be conistent and penalise all other such offenses.