M.O.M. v Hunslet (a) 15/02/09 : Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:44 pm  

Please leave your votes below.

3pts = 1st choice
2pts = 2nd choice
1pt = 3rd choice

Watene
Cherryholme
Haley

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:50 pm  

3 pts Watene

2 pts Greenwood

1 pt Cherryholme

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:00 pm  

Tamghart
Watene
Roberts

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:07 pm  

watene
roberts
cherryholme

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:10 pm  

3 - Frankie - Looking stronger and making more yards than last season.

2 - Mark Roberts - Good forward aggression and broke through regularly.

1 - Shad - Looks really determined to hold on to the No 1 position despite an equally strong display from Miles when he entered the game.

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:40 pm  

3pts - frank
2pts- shad
1pt - roberts

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:52 pm  

frank

shad

roberts..


No offence.. but how the people that have cherryholme in their 1,2,3 watched a different game to me. Am not baggin the lad but there were several players who had better games.

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:57 pm  

urbancarrot wrote:

No offence.. but how the people that have cherryholme in their 1,2,3 watched a different game to me. Am not baggin the lad but there were several players who had better games.

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:07 pm  

3pts Frankie

2pts Greenwood

1pt Roberts

: Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:10 pm  

urbancarrot wrote:

frank

shad

roberts..


No offence.. but how the people that have cherryholme in their 1,2,3 watched a different game to me. Am not baggin the lad but there were several players who had better games.

his second spell was very effective. surprised he played, but just because he isn't a big name doesn't mean e should be easy to bag. his inclusion in my top three was indicative of how garbage everyone else was.