Re: UK Asylum seekers : Thu Apr 14, 2022 4:51 pm  

chissitt wrote:

I keep getting a yellow line across my screen from the elusive one after my posts, I hope he's not being too unkind, but I rather think he's doing some chomping.

No I am just pointing out your inaccuracies, if you didn’t keep making them to defend de Pfeffel it wouldn’t be necessary.

Re: UK Asylum seekers : Thu Apr 14, 2022 9:47 pm  

wotsupcas wrote:

Costs a hell of a lot now. Government block booking hotels to keep them in, healthcare etc etc

Might be worth having a look at some actual figures.

Re: UK Asylum seekers : Thu Apr 14, 2022 10:59 pm  

Apparently it would cost less to put them up in the Ritz. If we had an actual legal routes to apply in their home countries this would mean that anyone turning up can be returned because they will have failed.

Re: UK Asylum seekers : Fri Apr 15, 2022 1:44 pm  

It's going to cost about 30k per person. It currently costs 12k. I'm sure the raging gammonati will consider the extra 18k is worth it to get rid of 'em.

Re: UK Asylum seekers : Fri Apr 15, 2022 1:56 pm  

I see the idea is backed by Le Pen in France the well known liberal but even she thinks it is too expensive.

Re: UK Asylum seekers : Fri Apr 15, 2022 5:29 pm  

Sounds like a decent proposition if it will deter more economic migrants coming across the channel.

Re: UK Asylum seekers : Sat Apr 16, 2022 10:10 am  

chissitt wrote:

He's apologised for lying and misleading Parliament

Has he ?

There was an apology for him "not knowing" that he's broken any of his own rules.
However, to apologise for misleading Parliament would mean admitting that he HAD misled Parliament ?

Re: UK Asylum seekers : Sat Apr 16, 2022 10:14 am  

wire-quin wrote:

Sounds like a decent proposition if it will deter more economic migrants coming across the channel.

Bugger, and it as Mr Tebbit that suggested that those looking for work should "get on their bikes", just as long as they dont want to work in the UK ?

It's amazing how quickly some Tories have gone from believing Rwanda was a dangerous place to be and now believing it's "the right" place to "process" illegal immigrants.
The legal challenges will certainly be interesting.

Perhaps we should just shoot them on sight and cut out the whole "process" ??

Re: UK Asylum seekers : Sat Apr 16, 2022 10:55 am  

wrencat1873 wrote:

Perhaps we should just shoot them on sight and cut out the whole "process" ??

Quite.Plus,if British manufactured weapons could be used,as per The Saudis in the Republic of Yemen,no one will make a fuss.
That'll be right,won't it?

Re: UK Asylum seekers : Sun Apr 17, 2022 3:09 am  

chissitt wrote:

That Starmer fellah is on Sky news having his 2 penneth, never heard him once have a good word for Boris strangely enough.

As you're just an honest broker, seeking to be fair to all sides, is it not strange that you never say, "that Johnson fellah, never heard him once have a good word to say about Kier"?