RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
22 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!
WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - US Presidential election 2020
::Off-topic discussion.
Re: US Presidential election 2020 Tue Jan 19, 2021 3:05 pm  

User avatarDHM wrote:
DHM User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 4:13 pm
Posts: 8873
Location: Garth's Darkplace.
Zoo Zoo Boom wrote:
The problem is now even with a vaccine there doesn't seem to be clarity about what they can achieve - do they stop the spread - doesn't appear so - does it stop people getting ill - doesn't appear so - it will prevent the most vulnerable from death if they get it. Does this really offer a way back to normality? I will definitely have the jab I am not in denial.



The vaccines stop people developing the disease - that's what efficacy means [Vaccine efficacy is the percentage reduction of disease in a vaccinated group of people compared to an unvaccinated group]. The clinical trials compared vaccinated with non vaccinated to generate "efficacy" data. "Effectiveness" of a vaccine can only be determined once it's been used in a population for a length of time. The vaccines for Covid 19 being given now clearly stop people from getting the disaese, that what was seen in the clinical trials.
You also have to remember that you can't vaccinate people then expose them to the disease and see what happens - that's not ethical, so vaccine clinical trials take usually much longer and it takes a lot of data collected over a long period of time to characterize how a vaccine affects disease transmission.

Vaccines are, like a many medical treatments, very much affected by the individual you put them in. Personalised medicine (tailoring medical treatments based on a specific individuals reactions) is big business and growing.
You have to be aware that vaccines usually take 5-10 years to develop and characterize (nearer 10 than 5). In that time data is accumulated and a detailed understanding of the effectiveness of the vaccine becomes known. You then carry on collecting data pretty much indefinitely. There are public health programs constantly on-going into other routine vaccinations like MMR for example. Most people probably don't even know they exist.

The simplest thing for one scientist to say to another is "I/We don't know", We all know what that means and it doesn't mean we'll never know or we can't make our mind up or we are lying. But, you say that to the general public, the press (just the general public with an enhanced sense of importance) etc. and you get a very different response.
Simple fact is that we will only really know how effective this vaccine is once we have given it to everyone and watched what happens to the disease.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33306989/

The real beauty of vaccines is that if you give them to enough people they eventually reduce the reservoir of disease in a population to the point where it dies out before it can re-infect. You know, the "R" number? A vaccine doesn't have to give 100% efficacy, non do, the cutoff for vaccine efficacy is 50%. But that's good enough to effectively make that R number so small that the disease basically disappears.
"Well, I think in Rugby League if you head butt someone there's normally some repercusions"
Re: US Presidential election 2020 Tue Jan 19, 2021 4:54 pm  

Zoo Zoo Boom wrote:
Zoo Zoo Boom Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2020 9:38 am
Posts: 450
DHM wrote:
The vaccines stop people developing the disease - that's what efficacy means [Vaccine efficacy is the percentage reduction of disease in a vaccinated group of people compared to an unvaccinated group]. The clinical trials compared vaccinated with non vaccinated to generate "efficacy" data. "Effectiveness" of a vaccine can only be determined once it's been used in a population for a length of time. The vaccines for Covid 19 being given now clearly stop people from getting the disaese, that what was seen in the clinical trials.
You also have to remember that you can't vaccinate people then expose them to the disease and see what happens - that's not ethical, so vaccine clinical trials take usually much longer and it takes a lot of data collected over a long period of time to characterize how a vaccine affects disease transmission.

Vaccines are, like a many medical treatments, very much affected by the individual you put them in. Personalised medicine (tailoring medical treatments based on a specific individuals reactions) is big business and growing.
You have to be aware that vaccines usually take 5-10 years to develop and characterize (nearer 10 than 5). In that time data is accumulated and a detailed understanding of the effectiveness of the vaccine becomes known. You then carry on collecting data pretty much indefinitely. There are public health programs constantly on-going into other routine vaccinations like MMR for example. Most people probably don't even know they exist.

The simplest thing for one scientist to say to another is "I/We don't know", We all know what that means and it doesn't mean we'll never know or we can't make our mind up or we are lying. But, you say that to the general public, the press (just the general public with an enhanced sense of importance) etc. and you get a very different response.
Simple fact is that we will only really know how effective this vaccine is once we have given it to everyone and watched what happens to the disease.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33306989/

The real beauty of vaccines is that if you give them to enough people they eventually reduce the reservoir of disease in a population to the point where it dies out before it can re-infect. You know, the "R" number? A vaccine doesn't have to give 100% efficacy, non do, the cutoff for vaccine efficacy is 50%. But that's good enough to effectively make that R number so small that the disease basically disappears.


Thank you a very interesting post.

The concerns for me are the MSM who roll out supposed experts and you get a polarised view. Morgan pro lockdown - as long as it doesn't impact him - rolls out Devi Sridhar who supports his view. JHB anti lockdown - stops her drinking Champagne in her favourite wine bar - she rolls out Sunetra Gupta who agrees with her. Surely there is a version of the truth that all these people agree on - or is so unclear that nobody really can quantify matters?
Re: US Presidential election 2020 Tue Jan 19, 2021 5:04 pm  

User avatarDHM wrote:
DHM User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 4:13 pm
Posts: 8873
Location: Garth's Darkplace.
Zoo Zoo Boom wrote:
You quote 50% between - my understanding is 80%+ of the death are occurring in the over 75's



Nope.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covi ... #AgeAndSex
"Well, I think in Rugby League if you head butt someone there's normally some repercusions"
Re: US Presidential election 2020 Tue Jan 19, 2021 5:17 pm  

User avatarDHM wrote:
DHM User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 4:13 pm
Posts: 8873
Location: Garth's Darkplace.
Zoo Zoo Boom wrote:
Thank you a very interesting post.

The concerns for me are the MSM who roll out supposed experts and you get a polarised view. Morgan pro lockdown - as long as it doesn't impact him - rolls out Devi Sridhar who supports his view. JHB anti lockdown - stops her drinking Champagne in her favourite wine bar - she rolls out Sunetra Gupta who agrees with her. Surely there is a version of the truth that all these people agree on - or is so unclear that nobody really can quantify matters?


These people are not experts. The problem has always been that genuinely smart people who know their subjects also know that there will almost certainly be things that they don't know, and are willing to admit that. This gives enough room for the JHB's, Toby Young's and the Peter Hitchens of this world to insert their own opinions as being valid as real experts or as absolute facts. Young's recent massive c**k up in the Telegraph is an example. And because these people get to a bigger audience they get the most publicity, most mentions and are more memorable.

If you want to know how difficult it is for TV pundits to make generalized statements around death rates and age and who to protect and who not to have a read through this.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-73777-8
"Well, I think in Rugby League if you head butt someone there's normally some repercusions"
Re: US Presidential election 2020 Wed Jan 20, 2021 3:57 pm  

Zoo Zoo Boom wrote:
Zoo Zoo Boom Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2020 9:38 am
Posts: 450
DHM wrote:
These people are not experts. The problem has always been that genuinely smart people who know their subjects also know that there will almost certainly be things that they don't know, and are willing to admit that. This gives enough room for the JHB's, Toby Young's and the Peter Hitchens of this world to insert their own opinions as being valid as real experts or as absolute facts. Young's recent massive c**k up in the Telegraph is an example. And because these people get to a bigger audience they get the most publicity, most mentions and are more memorable.

If you want to know how difficult it is for TV pundits to make generalized statements around death rates and age and who to protect and who not to have a read through this.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-73777-8


I am not talking about the likes of JHB, Morgan and Young I am talking about the likes of Sridar and Gupta who educate our university students - are you saying they are not experts?
Re: US Presidential election 2020 Wed Jan 20, 2021 3:58 pm  

Zoo Zoo Boom wrote:
Zoo Zoo Boom Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2020 9:38 am
Posts: 450


These tables relate to the US - what has that got to do with the UK death by age?
Re: US Presidential election 2020 Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:36 pm  

User avatarDHM wrote:
DHM User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 4:13 pm
Posts: 8873
Location: Garth's Darkplace.
Zoo Zoo Boom wrote:
These tables relate to the US - what has that got to do with the UK death by age?


I didn't say UK and in your question neither did you, I quoted death rates from covid. They are pretty much identical across the globe in every country and this is a good example table. Only variations are in countries like India and some of the developing countries where higher percentages of deaths are starting to appear in younger people.
I could have posted the UK figures for last week, the percentages are roughly the same.

Where did you get your data from?
"Well, I think in Rugby League if you head butt someone there's normally some repercusions"
Re: US Presidential election 2020 Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:39 pm  
The Ghost of '99 User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:45 pm
Posts: 2051
Location: Desperation Island
Well those last four years were some crazy ****.
"Brian McDermott, with a wry smile, nods when asked if he remembers a specific incident which made him realise he was a prick. 'I do', he murmurs."
Re: US Presidential election 2020 Wed Jan 20, 2021 6:29 pm  

User avatarDHM wrote:
DHM User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 4:13 pm
Posts: 8873
Location: Garth's Darkplace.
Zoo Zoo Boom wrote:
I am not talking about the likes of JHB, Morgan and Young I am talking about the likes of Sridar and Gupta who educate our university students - are you saying they are not experts?


You did mention JHB so I did.

As for Gupta, yes, she's an epidemiologist but maybe you should watch this cringeworthy interview with Andrew Neil from October, where in the first 2 minutes makes a total fool of herself by saying (prompted by the human potato) the 50,000 cases per day projected by the governments advisors was nonsense. Where did we get to? 85,000 on one day in December?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxrG4hW3q2s

Gupta has been on the fringe of the scientific consensus since the beginning of the pandemic and is a strong proponent of herd immunity. Many of her predictions have been proved to be false and she has a poor track record on predictions.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... oronavirus

Herd immunity, the Great Barrington Declaration and the "Libertarians" behind it. Have a read of this.
https://arena.org.au/the-coming-covid-s ... claration/
It's not entirely critical and I think a well balanced review. We should not discount alternatives, that's counter productive - all options on the table.

The problem with Gupta in particular is that she's made grand statements and assumptions that have proved to be very, very inaccurate or just plain wrong. She also seems incapable of re-assessing her own position..

To be honest you can find all this out for yourself, I don't know why I'm doing it for you.


I actually work with some of the guys in the Oxford Zoology department, spoke to one of them today in fact. They are doing interesting work on Covid.
"Well, I think in Rugby League if you head butt someone there's normally some repercusions"
Re: US Presidential election 2020 Thu Jan 21, 2021 2:14 pm  

Zoo Zoo Boom wrote:
Zoo Zoo Boom Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2020 9:38 am
Posts: 450
DHM wrote:
I didn't say UK and in your question neither did you, I quoted death rates from covid. They are pretty much identical across the globe in every country and this is a good example table. Only variations are in countries like India and some of the developing countries where higher percentages of deaths are starting to appear in younger people.
I could have posted the UK figures for last week, the percentages are roughly the same.

Where did you get your data from?


I think you knew very well I was quoting the the UK - and quoting one week is hardly representative.
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Zoo Zoo Boom and 150 guests

Quick Reply



Subject:
Message:

   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.

Return to The Sin Bin


When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
YOU HAVE RL CHAT OFF
RLFANS Match Centre
Sun 19th Sep
SL RND: 25 Huddersfield42-24Leigh
CH RND: 22 Bradford22-36Whitehaven
CH RND: 22 Dewsbury21-14Oldham
CH RND: 22 Featherstone78-10Sheffield
CH RND: 22 Halifax10-12Batley
CH RND: 22 Swinton16-26Widnes
CH RND: 22 York30-22LondonB
L1 RND: 22 Doncaster31-10Hunslet
WSL RND: 16 St.HelensW52-0WiganW
WSL RND: 16 YorkW28-14CastlefordW
Sat 18th Sep
NRL RND: 27 Penrith8-6Parramatta
CH RND: 22 Newcastle12-82Toulouse
L1 RND: 22 Crusaders14-28Keighley
Fri 17th Sep
SL RND: 25 Leeds36-12Hull KR
SL RND: 25 Salford26-14St.Helens
SLRND: 25 Wakefield44-12Hull FC
SL RND: 25 Wigan12-8Catalans
NRL RND: 27 Manly42-6Sydney
Thu 16th Sep
SL RND: 25 Castleford24-40Warrington
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
National Rugby League 2021 ROUND : 25
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Melbourne 24 815 316 499 42
Penrith 24 640 280 360 42
Souths 24 775 453 322 40
Manly 24 744 492 252 32
Sydney 24 636 475 161 32
Parramatta 24 566 457 109 30
Newcastle 24 428 571 -143 24
Gold Coast 24 568 553 15 20
 
Cronulla 24 512 556 -44 20
Canberra 24 481 578 -97 20
St.George 24 474 616 -142 16
NZ Warriors 24 453 624 -171 16
Wests 24 500 714 -214 16
Brisbane 24 446 695 -249 14
NQL Cowboys 24 460 748 -288 14
Canterbury 24 340 710 -370 6
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred Super League XXVI ROUND : 25
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
Catalans 23 688 398 290 38 172.86 82.61
St.Helens 21 548 229 319 32 239.30 76.19
Warrington 21 588 354 234 31 166.10 73.81
Wigan 25 387 385 2 30 100.52 60
Leeds 24 556 440 116 26 126.36 54.17
Hull KR 20 497 458 39 20 108.52 50
 
Castleford 23 439 552 -113 22 79.53 47.83
Hull FC 21 409 476 -67 17 85.92 40.48
Huddersfield 24 460 516 -56 18 89.15 37.50
Wakefield 24 482 548 -66 18 87.96 37.50
Salford 22 402 586 -184 14 68.60 31.82
Leigh 22 356 870 -514 4 40.92 9.09
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred Championship 2021 ROUND : 20
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
Toulouse 13 616 112 504 26 550 100
Featherstone 19 817 254 563 34 321.65 94.74
Halifax 19 512 323 189 26 158.51 68.42
Bradford 18 483 455 28 24 106.15 66.67
LondonB 18 504 499 5 21 101 63.89
Batley 19 525 370 155 24 141.89 63.16
 
Whitehaven 20 447 496 -49 21 90.12 52.50
York 19 470 455 15 16 103.30 42.11
Widnes 19 458 509 -51 15 89.98 39.47
Newcastle 18 381 521 -140 13 73.13 36.11
Sheffield 18 382 553 -171 13 69.08 36.11
Dewsbury 19 308 570 -262 13 54.04 34.21
Oldham 19 270 691 -421 5 39.07 13.16
Swinton 20 354 719 -365 3 49.24 7.50
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred League One 2021 ROUND : 22
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
Barrow 17 596 275 321 27 216.73 79.41
Workington 15 471 310 161 21 151.94 70
Doncaster 18 503 400 103 24 125.75 66.67
Keighley 19 640 399 241 25 160.40 65.79
Crusaders 18 553 438 115 22 126.26 61.11
Hunslet 19 572 466 106 20 122.75 52.63
 
Rochdale 17 505 488 17 17 103.48 50
Coventry 17 407 460 -53 12 88.48 35.29
LondonS 18 292 577 -285 7 50.61 19.44
West Wales 18 208 896 -688 1 23.21 2.78
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred Womens Super League 2021 ROUND : 9
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
St.HelensW 7 370 36 334 12 1,027.78 85.71
WiganW 6 222 64 158 10 346.88 83.33
YorkW 6 186 102 84 8 182.35 66.67
CastlefordW 6 166 96 70 8 172.92 66.67
BradfordW 8 158 264 -106 6 59.85 37.50
Hudds W 7 104 288 -184 4 36.11 28.57
 
Wire W 8 150 334 -184 4 44.91 25
FeatherstoneW 8 122 338 -216 4 36.09 25
LeedsW 7 364 38 326 14 957.89 100
WakefieldW 7 50 332 -282 0 15.06 0
RLFANS Recent Posts




X
::::::::