XBrettKennyX wrote:
That well known independent institution the BBC. Or "Buggers Broadcasting Communism" as it is known............................ What next? Citing Mein Kampf as evidence for social policy?
So that is your only comment on the reports that the government caved in to threats of resignation or the possibility of resignation?
If there is no truth in it Peston who is hardly what you might call left wing and the BBC are going to get sued out of existence.
In terms of the bonus, I have to say I am not privy to the T&C's of his contract etc However, IF he has "turned the bank around" and saved the taxpayer say £50m and IF the terms were he would get 2% of it then good luck to him. That's a net £49m for the treasury (i.e. you and I), job done.
RBS just canned an IT project that cost £200m. They are starting again.
Their share price is also down to around 28p so he has not added any value to the company which is what we as taxpayers need to get our cash back not some imaginary £50m you have dreamt up for the sake of your argument.
The main problem we have at the moment with the banks is despite most of them being bailed out none of the ones banks including RBS are lending as the government would like them to. And he gets a bonus for that!
So why, given the above did the government not veto the bonus? They can do so and Hester knows that is the deal so there is no question of broken contracts here. It appears they didn't because of threats or perceived threats to resign.
Equally good luck to them, pay as much money to their staff as they like. There is no reason for public outcry.
So you do not think the bonus chasing culture had anything at al to do with the banking crisis? We have had banks go bust because of the bonus culture. Remember Nick Leason? There was very recently some French bloke who lost his bank a fortune. Huge bonuses encourage risk taking and also encourage people to make deals that are in their interest so they get the bonus and often go against the interests of the wider population due to thinks like currency speculation and other dubious ways to make money.
There is no problem with paying a CEO of any company a high wage. However there is no need to add to Hester's £1.2m salary to the tune of over £900K.
It is also true that banking CEO's get a far higher remuneration than say the boss of engineering firm and the main reason they do is this merry go round of bonuses given by remuneration committees who site fear of them leaving if they don't. It is complete and utter rubbish.