Re: Kier Starmer : Tue Nov 30, 2021 8:07 am  

The Ghost of '99 wrote:

Do you ever wonder what the point of your life is, when it seems to mostly revolve around posting made up stuff on a Rugby League website?

Got to agree with you on this NOD, what is the point of your life making up stuff on a rugby league website trying to make yourself look intelligent and hoping nobody will catch you out with your half truths?

Re: Kier Starmer : Tue Nov 30, 2021 8:30 am  

JONNYGIANT wrote:

Well he's gone and done it now,cabinet reshuffling without telling Rayner and kicking another corbynista out to boot ,he won't make the next election as leader

The thing here is JONNY, you can understand Boris getting rid of some cabinet members who don't do they're job properly, but Starmers lads are only pretend cabinet ministers that don't have a job and their only aim is to get up the speakers nose and cause disruption in the house when Boris is doing his business, other than that they don't have a job they are redundant, most of them can't even get a second job, so can you imagine Starmers embarrassment when he has to sack them sorry reshuffle them because they can't even get doing nothing right, but I'm sure Wink Blink and Nod will be on here sometime today after they've sorted out the worlds problems to make the necessary excuses for the incompetence, all three have a great sidestep so get ready for them to turn it round and blame the Prime Minister.

Re: Kier Starmer : Tue Nov 30, 2021 8:40 am  

chissitt wrote:

The thing here is JONNY, you can understand Boris getting rid of some cabinet members who don't do they're job properly, but Starmers lads are only pretend cabinet ministers that don't have a job and their only aim is to get up the speakers nose and cause disruption in the house when Boris is doing his business, other than that they don't have a job they are redundant, most of them can't even get a second job, so can you imagine Starmers embarrassment when he has to sack them sorry reshuffle them because they can't even get doing nothing right, but I'm sure Wink Blink and Nod will be on here sometime today after they've sorted out the worlds problems to make the necessary excuses for the incompetence, all three have a great sidestep so get ready for them to turn it round and blame the Prime Minister.

I see that you've been swatting up on how Parliament works (not).
I know that Bojo likes to think of himself as some kind of US president but, thankfully we haven't reached that stage over here yet.
You finally post some kind of opinion and I can see why you dont post you thoughts very often, preferring to snipe form the sidelines.

You should stick with finding a song beginning with "A"

Re: Kier Starmer : Tue Nov 30, 2021 9:09 am  

wrencat1873 wrote:

I see that you've been swatting up on how Parliament works (not).
I know that Bojo likes to think of himself as some kind of US president but, thankfully we haven't reached that stage over here yet.
You finally post some kind of opinion and I can see why you dont post you thoughts very often, preferring to snipe form the sidelines.

You should stick with finding a song beginning with "A"

Go on then Wink, explain in simple terms a) how do you know Boris likes to think himself as some kind of US president (this should be interesting) and b) just what exactly is a some kind of a US president, as for swatting up on how Parliament works wrong again squire, I was simply having a nap in me rocking chair after my tea and I heard it on the wireless, but you got that right when you say I don't post my thoughts very often, unlike your good self squire I see no point in implanting my thoughts on posters incessantly like you do trying to make yourself look intelligent, as for sniping isn't that what you and the Bowery boys do constantly with your innuendo's and half truths against the PM and the elected Government of the day same old same old. get a grip lad your sounding like your bezzie every day.

Re: Kier Starmer : Tue Nov 30, 2021 9:21 am  

chissit just casually holding Labour shadow ministers to higher account for incompetence than actual ministers. Totally normal.

Re: Kier Starmer : Tue Nov 30, 2021 9:59 am  

Never thought Kier Starmer had sense of humour. Apparently I was wrong, appointing David Lammy a stroke of comedy genius.

Re: Kier Starmer : Tue Nov 30, 2021 10:00 am  

Backwoodsman wrote:

Never thought Kier Starmer had sense of humour. Apparently I was wrong, appointing David Lammy a stroke of comedy genius.

Like Dianne Abbott he certainly triggers a lot of people.

Re: Kier Starmer : Tue Nov 30, 2021 10:07 am  

The Ghost of '99 wrote:

chissit just casually holding Labour shadow ministers to higher account for incompetence than actual ministers. Totally normal.

Please explain to me in simple terms Nod how I can hold Labour shadow ministers to higher account for incompetence than proper Government ministers, they're the ones that have a proper job and as such are accountable, where as those you constantly wax lyrical about don't have a job they can only dream of having a government post, don't take my word for it, ask the electorate, if your team were any good they would have been voted in, as I said before despite getting paid for doing nothing Starmers had to get rid of some of them, which beggars the question is he the right man to run the country when he can't even select a B team.

Re: Kier Starmer : Tue Nov 30, 2021 10:25 am  

At least you are showing your true colours (blue) but you still couldn’t bring yourself to go out and vote for them.

Re: Kier Starmer : Tue Nov 30, 2021 10:28 am  

chissitt wrote:

Please explain to me in simple terms Nod how I can hold Labour shadow ministers to higher account for incompetence than proper Government ministers, they're the ones that have a proper job and as such are accountable, where as those you constantly wax lyrical about don't have a job they can only dream of having a government post, don't take my word for it, ask the electorate, if your team were any good they would have been voted in, as I said before despite getting paid for doing nothing Starmers had to get rid of some of them, which beggars the question is he the right man to run the country when he can't even select a B team.

As Ronald Reagan said, there you go again! I've yet to see you raise even the slightest objection to the gross incompetence and corruption seen in the current government, or delight in its many reshuffles. But Starmer does a reshuffle and you delight in the apparent evidence of the incompetence running through his party.

I've no real skin in the game as neither party is one I'd choose in a free choice. But when one is so obviously incompetent and that's the one presently in power it seems a bit odd to only focus on the people holding them to account.