FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!

   WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - More undeserving poor told they should work for benefits
::Off-topic discussion.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
In The Arms of 13 Angels26578
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 08 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
6th Jul 17 23:1930th Apr 17 15:32LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
On the set of NEDS...
Signature
Image


ebay's Rugby League Bargains ¦ Boost Your eBay Sales ¦ Recommended Amazon Stuff ¦ Get a Free Ink Cart!!! ¦ Quins RL T-Shirts, BRAND NEW DESIGNS

Sal Paradise wrote:
You cannot base a benefits system on the worst case scenario.


Of course you can infact you should, that is the whole meaning of welfare.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Coach4063
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 05 200520 years216th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
13th Oct 24 10:1212th Oct 24 19:01LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Cheshire

I'm f*cked when i get old

To put it eloquently
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Board Member29214No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 10 200321 years114th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
4th Dec 24 06:3422nd Nov 24 13:21LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Warrington

The limitation of benefits to 2 kids is fair enough. But like with the new mortgage regulations, it surely couldn't be applied to people who already had more than 2 kids when it was brought in? People say 'you shouldn't have kids if you can't pay for them', which is fine, but benefits are a legitimate item when planning 'can I afford this?' scenarios.
Gaz_E 
RankPostsTeam
Club Coach4339No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 08 200420 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
15th Sep 16 13:5615th Mar 16 12:59LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
In the Night Garden - travelling by Ninkynonk
Signature
<insert witty comment when applicable>

Sal Paradise wrote:
Perhaps if women had to wait until they were the same age as men before they could claim might help?


Already happening. They'll be at equal age (65) by 2018 and then gradually rising to 68 by the end of 2045. I fully expect this to have been changed to 70 before then. This will also be the minimum qualifying age to receive pension means test benefits (Pension Credit)

Huge savings to be made as people will barely survive to see the end of their working lives. Just waiting for a change in the state pension inheritance rules so the government makes sure they get to keep even more.

I could go into far more detail about this if i had the time - seeing as I work for the DWP. Luckily, lots of info available on the HMRC, DWP, and 'GOV' websites for anyone interested to dig a little further.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
All Time Great47951No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
May 10 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
6th Aug 17 19:0327th Jul 17 17:56LINK
Milestone Posts
40000
50000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Die Metropole
Signature
"You are working for Satan." Kirkstaller

"Dare to know!" Immanuel Kant

"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive" Elbert Hubbard

"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." Oscar Wilde

The Voluptuous Manifesto – thoughts on all sorts of stuff.

Sal Paradise wrote:
Unlike yourself - I don't claim to have the only opinion that matters...


You have done exactly that.

earlier, Sal Paradise wrote:
Those of us fortunate enough to have a job have to work to provide the taxes to provide the funding for the benefits. Can no one see why those that do work resent supporting those that "do not want to work" and would like to see them at least contribute something for the money...


In other words: 'there is only one opinion held by all people who work – and I'm posting it now and here.'

Nobody else who works has any other opinion.

Sal Paradise wrote:
Every thread on here moves away from the original OP often caused by you trying to ram your righteous preachings down everyone's throat....


No. It doesn't. Not least because I don't post on anything like every thread on this forum. And if threads move away from a specific opening, it's often because that's what happens in conversation in, err, 'real life'.

Sal Paradise wrote:
The fact remains how with an ageing population does the country afford the OAP - a debate you seem to have avoided on this thread!! Perhaps the government should just keep borrowing, after all you think the deficit is pretty low - compared to the years after the second world war!!


The deficit is low – compared to the years after WWII. Well done. Perhaps there's hope for your understanding.

And I have not avoided the central issue. I have – more than once – pointed out that there is no need to raise taxes further; just collect corporation tax properly.

You may not agree with that – as is your right. But pretending I haven't made some sort of suggestion when I patently have simply makes you look silly.

Sal Paradise wrote:
Perhaps if women had to wait until they were the same age as men before they could claim might help?


This is happening.
Dally 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman14845No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 22 200123 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
23rd Oct 21 15:0122nd Jul 21 09:42LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

There is a fair percentage of current / soon to be pensioners that have good retirement incomes - I was shocked to read how many are on pensions of over £40,000pa. So, why not means test the state pension. Say none for anyone with other pension income of over a cetain figure - say £35,000pa. Surely that would go along way to solving the crisis and may even allow an increase in state pension to those with no other source of income?
Dally 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman14845No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 22 200123 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
23rd Oct 21 15:0122nd Jul 21 09:42LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Mintball wrote:

The deficit is low – compared to the years after WWII. Well done. Perhaps there's hope for your understanding.



Genuine question - was the deficit high after WW2? Do you have a link to any article?

I know the national debt was huge, c. 250% of GDP but that went down very quickly. That does not imply a big deficit.
Gaz_E 
RankPostsTeam
Club Coach4339No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 08 200420 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
15th Sep 16 13:5615th Mar 16 12:59LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
In the Night Garden - travelling by Ninkynonk
Signature
<insert witty comment when applicable>

Dally wrote:
So, why not means test the state pension. Say none for anyone with other pension income of over a cetain figure - say £35,000pa. Surely that would go along way to solving the crisis and may even allow an increase in state pension to those with no other source of income?


You can't means test it in the true terms of 'means testing'.

The State Pension has a number of elements to it. The basic element is based on NI contributions only. For anyone reaching State Pension age after 06/04/10 this would mean needing 30 qualifying years to get the full basic element (new rules). Anyone reaching State Pension age prior to this date needed 46 years (male) & 39 years (female) - (old rules). The basic pension with a full record is currently £107.45 p/w, pro-rated down as a fraction (i.e. 25 qualifying years would get 25/30 of a full basic element) for new rules, and a percentage for old rules.

Other elements - known as additional state pension based on earnings in excess of the minimum amount needed to gain a qualifying year have conditions attached related to having a private/workplace pension. The rules related to this is available on numerous websites, and are far too involved to go into any great detail here. The basic jist though is if you've got your own arrangement, you're not likely to get much of the additional state pension, if any. There are four different versions in operation though - one that ran from 1961-1975, another from 1978-1997, another from 1997-2002, and lastly from 2002 onwards. What you do get though is a reduced rate of NI you pay (1.4% less) on your earnings if you are part of an employers pension scheme.

So in effect those with large private pension pots are already penalised by the state. Also, the state pension is a taxable benefit - along with any private pensions, so if anyone is getting £40k+ per year in combined pensions then they should be paying tax at the appropriate rate with it.

Those with no other source of income are currently supported by Pension Credit - where if a person is in reciept of this they are exempt from council tax and usually live rent free. There is assistence with mortgage interest payments, and a disregard on the first £10k of savings. People with other sources of income can also claim this, but those sources are taken into account against the payable amount.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman18060No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 27 200223 years319th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
11th Jun 23 20:4411th Jun 23 20:53LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
On the road
Signature
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.

Mintball wrote:
You have done exactly that.

In other words: 'there is only one opinion held by all people who work – and I'm posting it now and here.'

Nobody else who works has any other opinion.

No. It doesn't. Not least because I don't post on anything like every thread on this forum. And if threads move away from a specific opening, it's often because that's what happens in conversation in, err, 'real life'.

The deficit is low – compared to the years after WWII. Well done. Perhaps there's hope for your understanding.

And I have not avoided the central issue. I have – more than once – pointed out that there is no need to raise taxes further; just collect corporation tax properly.

You may not agree with that – as is your right. But pretending I haven't made some sort of suggestion when I patently have simply makes you look silly.

This is happening.


What I said was for someone who has a job can you not understand the frustration of those i.e. me who pay taxes against those who simply do not want to work - I was speaking only of myself - I would be surprised if I were a lone voice.

As has been pointed out on numerous threads on here corporation tax is a relatively small tax revenue stream - even if it were collected properly and assuming there will losses in other countries who would be far more stringent on UK companies operating in their countries - it will not cover a potentially huge deficit. Your suggestion makes you look silly.

Comparing a deficit now to the deficit after WW11 is also very silly - you cannot seriously suggest the two things are even comparable. The sad thing is you think they are!!

Equilibrium between the sexes will happen when? not in your lifetime - so to say it is happening is like saying oil is running out!!

It would be interesting for someone to look at how many threads include your self righteous diatribe.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach11757No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 22 200717 years334th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
22nd Sep 24 17:1223rd Apr 24 17:24LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Leeds
Signature
//peakwalking.blogspot.co.uk/

Sal Paradise wrote:
What I said was for someone who has a job can you not understand the frustration of those i.e. me who pay taxes against those who simply do not want to work - I was speaking only of myself - I would be surprised if I were a lone voice.


You’re falling into the classic trap of moaning about something that you can’t do anything about. Even if benefits stopped going towards those who ‘don’t want to work’ then it would not mean paying out less tax for the likes of yourself. These taxes will just go on other things that you wouldn’t want your money going towards. Still you highlight the unemployed more than any other group which are financed by taxpayers.

From my experience I discovered that there’s a whole story behind why people don’t want to work anymore. An elderly relative of mine for example got forced to go on Job Seekers Allowance one year before she could collect her pension. She was a carer for many years but lost her job due to public cuts and only had a year left till she could officially retire. Is this the type of person you don’t want your taxes going towards?

Another example would be male relative in my family who has had at least two periods in his life where he was unemployed for five long years but he’s worked full time most of his life. At times he wouldn’t fill in any application form or bother looking for work. But he’s now working full time and will probably do so till retirement. Is this the kind of person you don’t want your taxes going towards?

Then there’s my mate who was unemployed for seven years after he finished university but he’s now working for one of the top technology companies in Leeds and is getting more freelance work than what he can handle. Before all of this he was in a right state and was wondering what he could do with his life. Is this the kind of person you don’t want your taxes going towards?

That’s just three examples and I could come up with loads.

Now let’s look at this from a slightly different prospective. Mozart came from a broken family which were similar to the ones you probably resent today. Now let’s pretend that Mozart was born in the same circumstances today as he was born into back in the day. Let’s pretend he was born in Britain where the government is looking to cut benefits for Family’s that have more than two children. He would be absolutely doomed and when he grows up he’d probably be sent to stack shelves at the local supermarket for £0 an hour. But hey that’s ok because he comes from a broken family and they on benefits – too right they should work. What a great talent we would have lost.

Now I could give examples of numerous artists in Leeds that are going to waste because society has invested in them the wrong way. Not too long back I was on the verge of becoming a manager for a big artist in Leeds in order to help him progress with his acting career. I put his name out there to agents and there’s a good chance that as a result Emmerdale chose to film in one of his club nights. Ok it didn’t quite work out because I didn’t really have the best of resources and he wasn’t paying me to go out and get them. He tried to get me a job with one of his partners but that didn’t work out but we’re still sound with each other today.

However things are on the verge of working out very well indeed for me. Am I the kind of person you don’t want your taxes going towards?

Personally I’ve concluded that too many people have took me for granted (which we all do with anyone if they’ve been around for a while) and I’ve had to take my abilities elsewhere. I was on the verge of working with channel four until I had an argument with a simpleton jobs worth.

Watch this space and I highly recommend you channel your frustrations into something more constructive than those who are unemployed.
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 246 guests

REPLY

Subject: 
Message:
   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...

Return to The Sin Bin


RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
16s
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
Armavinit
2
24s
Pre Season - 2025
Chris71
225
27s
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
TitanicClown
4066
40s
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
40860
1m
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
63325
1m
Transfer Talk V5
ArthurClues
561
1m
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
RLFANS News
1
1m
2025 Kits
bonaire
31
1m
Salford placed in special measures
supercat
126
2m
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
MadDogg
3
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Wigan warriors 2022 away shirt
WWste
1
TODAY
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
MadDogg
3
TODAY
Rule Changes
mwindass
4
TODAY
Player Contracts
Trojan Horse
4
TODAY
Fans Forum 12 Dec 11th
Dunkirk Spir
3
TODAY
Laurie Daley returns as NSW origin coach
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
2025 Challenge Cup
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Challenge Cup
BigTime
6
TODAY
Friendlies
Deadcowboys1
3
TODAY
Sam Luckley likely to miss the beginning of new season
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
Frankie Halton sign new deal
ColD
2
TODAY
Transfer chatter for 2025 - New Dec 1st tamper date
HU8HFC
29
TODAY
Trinity shop Sunday opening
phe13
1
TODAY
Tyler Craig
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Matty Ashurst testimonial dinner
Big lads mat
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
RLFANS Match Centre
Matches on TV
Thu 13th Feb
SL
20:00
Wigan-Leigh
Fri 14th Feb
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Castleford
SL
20:00
Catalans-Hull FC
Sat 15th Feb
SL
15:00
Leeds - Wakefield
SL
17:30
St.Helens-Salford
Sun 16th Feb
SL
15:00
Huddersfield-Warrington
Thu 20th Feb
SL
20:00
Wakefield - Hull KR
Fri 21st Feb
SL
20:00
Warrington-Catalans
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Wigan
Sat 22nd Feb
SL
15:00
Salford-Leeds
SL
20:00
Castleford-St.Helens
Sun 23rd Feb
SL
14:30
Leigh-Huddersfield
Fri 28th Feb
SL
20:00
Huddersfield-Hull FC
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Salford
SL
20:00
Leigh-Catalans
Sat 1st Mar
SL
14:30
Wakefield - St.Helens
SL
21:30
Wigan-Warrington
Sun 2nd Mar
SL
15:00
Leeds-Castleford
Thu 6th Mar
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Leigh
Fri 7th Mar
SL
20:00
Castleford-Salford
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wigan 29 768 338 430 48
Hull KR 29 731 344 387 44
Warrington 29 769 351 418 42
Leigh 29 580 442 138 33
Salford 28 556 561 -5 32
St.Helens 28 618 411 207 30
 
Catalans 27 475 427 48 30
Leeds 27 530 488 42 28
Huddersfield 27 468 658 -190 20
Castleford 27 425 735 -310 15
Hull FC 27 328 894 -566 6
LondonB 27 317 916 -599 6
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wakefield 27 1032 275 757 52
Toulouse 26 765 388 377 37
Bradford 28 723 420 303 36
York 29 695 501 194 32
Widnes 27 561 502 59 29
Featherstone 27 634 525 109 28
 
Sheffield 26 626 526 100 28
Doncaster 26 498 619 -121 25
Halifax 26 509 650 -141 22
Batley 26 422 591 -169 22
Swinton 28 484 676 -192 20
Barrow 25 442 720 -278 19
Whitehaven 25 437 826 -389 18
Dewsbury 27 348 879 -531 4
Hunslet 1 6 10 -4 0
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
16s
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
Armavinit
2
24s
Pre Season - 2025
Chris71
225
27s
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
TitanicClown
4066
40s
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
40860
1m
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
63325
1m
Transfer Talk V5
ArthurClues
561
1m
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
RLFANS News
1
1m
2025 Kits
bonaire
31
1m
Salford placed in special measures
supercat
126
2m
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
MadDogg
3
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Wigan warriors 2022 away shirt
WWste
1
TODAY
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
MadDogg
3
TODAY
Rule Changes
mwindass
4
TODAY
Player Contracts
Trojan Horse
4
TODAY
Fans Forum 12 Dec 11th
Dunkirk Spir
3
TODAY
Laurie Daley returns as NSW origin coach
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
2025 Challenge Cup
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Challenge Cup
BigTime
6
TODAY
Friendlies
Deadcowboys1
3
TODAY
Sam Luckley likely to miss the beginning of new season
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
Frankie Halton sign new deal
ColD
2
TODAY
Transfer chatter for 2025 - New Dec 1st tamper date
HU8HFC
29
TODAY
Trinity shop Sunday opening
phe13
1
TODAY
Tyler Craig
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Matty Ashurst testimonial dinner
Big lads mat
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!