FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!

   WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - How do cutbacks save economies?
::Off-topic discussion.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
All Time Great47951No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
May 10 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
6th Aug 17 19:0327th Jul 17 17:56LINK
Milestone Posts
40000
50000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Die Metropole
Signature
"You are working for Satan." Kirkstaller

"Dare to know!" Immanuel Kant

"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive" Elbert Hubbard

"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." Oscar Wilde

The Voluptuous Manifesto – thoughts on all sorts of stuff.

Re: How do cutbacks save economies? : Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:51 pm  
We make so little, these days, that we import most of what we buy (in terms of clothes etc – and, indeed, food). Which is a huge part of what is messing up the balance of payments, as we export much less.

If you can export a service – fine. But most cannot be exported.

Similarly, if we manufactured/produced stuff here – and sold it here, that would have a positive impact on the balance of payments.
DaveO 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Moderator14395No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 22 200123 years325th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
4th May 24 14:0028th May 22 23:44LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Chester
Signature
Last league derby at Central Park 5/9/1999: Wigan 28 St. Helens 20
Last league derby at Knowsley Road 2/4/2010: St. Helens 10 Wigan 18
Moderator

Re: How do cutbacks save economies? : Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:06 pm  
Richie wrote:
We are both manufacturer and data centre provider. One method counts as a product sale, and one as a service sale.
In fact the client could also lease the server from us in which case we've sold a service, or buy and lease via a financing company (which may be part of my company of may be external) in which case we've sold a product, to a financing company.


If you had to build the server whether you run it on your clients behalf, lease it to them or sell it to them you are a manufacturer. In you buy the server to then sell on, lease or use in your data centre on your clients behalf then you are a service provider. The fact your accounts department may class you running a server you manufactured for your client as a service sale is semantics. It is who built it that counts.

The point is that there seems to be a view that a service based economy isn't as real as a product based manufacturing economy, when in reality service and product aren't necessarily that different.


If you don't build the servers (in your example) and say bought them in from a manufacturer in the USA then it definitely isn't as real.
Richie 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman17134No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 22 200123 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
11th Sep 20 21:449th Aug 20 18:21LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Johannesberg, South Africa
Signature
Northampton RL....details here: //www.northamptonrl.co.uk

Re: How do cutbacks save economies? : Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:11 pm  
DaveO wrote:
If you had to build the server whether you run it on your clients behalf, lease it to them or sell it to them you are a manufacturer. In you buy the server to then sell on, lease or use in your data centre on your clients behalf then you are a service provider. The fact your accounts department may class you running a server you manufactured for your client as a service sale is semantics. It is who built it that counts.

If you don't build the servers (in your example) and say bought them in from a manufacturer in the USA then it definitely isn't as real.


If we sell that server as a service, then in the whole wrap up of "what is the UK economy" then it counts as a service. Even though in both cases we have built a server and it's utilised in the same way, just charged differently.
RankPostsTeam
International Board Member335No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 04 200222 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
31st Oct 13 05:5630th Apr 13 10:43LINK
Milestone Posts
250
500
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Chester
Signature
TotalRl.com - Home of Stupid Questions, Friday Pix and of course Millward is a Gurner.

Re: How do cutbacks save economies? : Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:12 pm  
Mintball wrote:
And don't decry farming: why not? Why not improve our own food production and security, eh?

But y'see, your little knee is playing those jerkery games so you're not reading all of what I have posted. Either that or you have comprehension difficulties.

I have said, the economy needs rebalancing. At present, 75% depends on people purchasing services or goods.

We need to start creating things and selling them – preferably including actually exporting them.

This does not happen overnight – and indeed, I'm still waiting for details of the product that can be designed, created and a market found for it overnight.

So in the meantime, while that process is happening, we need to create jobs – or the recession will continue, there will be no growth and the deficit will increase. Do you not understand that?


i've read everything you posted, still you carry on with the patronising 'i know so much than you' tack, that so many round here seem to buy into.

so, are we training everyone to install insulation or be farmers now? why not plumbers, they all earn 100k don't they?

just a few quick questions. when we've trained up all these home insulators, the ones who are rubbish at it, they fall through the ceilings and stuff like that, what happens when they can't get any work? then you've got those already doing this job who suddenly see their income drop as more flood the market, do we dole out the money to them too?

we're in recession and the deficit is actually decreasing. thought you might know that, or is it 'comprehension difficulties'?

it's good that you want to just magic jobs from thin air, you should really tell important people that.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
All Time Great47951No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
May 10 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
6th Aug 17 19:0327th Jul 17 17:56LINK
Milestone Posts
40000
50000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Die Metropole
Signature
"You are working for Satan." Kirkstaller

"Dare to know!" Immanuel Kant

"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive" Elbert Hubbard

"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." Oscar Wilde

The Voluptuous Manifesto – thoughts on all sorts of stuff.

Re: How do cutbacks save economies? : Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:09 pm  
samwire wrote:
... Another post of utter, ncomprehending tripe ....


I know - go and invest in some education. The amount you'll have to spend will have us out of recession and the deficit paid off in no time.

I may reply in detail later, but it's probably pointless in terms of your willingness/ability to comprehend the issues - but then I don't mind a touch of masochism.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
In The Arms of 13 Angels26578
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 08 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
6th Jul 17 23:1930th Apr 17 15:32LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
On the set of NEDS...
Signature
Image


ebay's Rugby League Bargains ¦ Boost Your eBay Sales ¦ Recommended Amazon Stuff ¦ Get a Free Ink Cart!!! ¦ Quins RL T-Shirts, BRAND NEW DESIGNS

Re: How do cutbacks save economies? : Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:14 pm  
samwire wrote:
we're in recession


We are, a double dip one when the last government had us on the up turn.

samwire wrote:
and the deficit is actually decreasing.


You may want to check that.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Star3605No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 09 201212 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
20th May 16 14:5420th May 16 10:16LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Leeds
Signature
Someday everything is gonna be different, when I paint my masterpiece
----------------------------------------------------------
Online art gallery, selling original landscape artwork
----------------------------------------------------------
JerryChicken - The Blog
----------------------------------------------------------

Re: How do cutbacks save economies? : Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:18 pm  
samwire wrote:
oh, so we're not just training them to bung some insulation in. they're going to be designing and fitting windows as well. will the polymer science training be just as quick as the installing insulation training? and there's the new glass technology that these poor buggers will be developing too.


You're making a bit of a fool out of yourself now.
Kosh 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Moderator36786
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 31 200321 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
3rd Aug 24 20:266th May 23 08:43LINK
Milestone Posts
30000
40000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Leafy Worcester, home of the Black Pear
Signature
Hold on to me baby, his bony hands will do you no harm
It said in the cards, we lost our souls to the Nameless One
Moderator

Re: How do cutbacks save economies? : Fri Oct 12, 2012 8:42 pm  
JerryChicken wrote:
You're making a bit of a fool out of yourself now.

A bit?
DaveO 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Moderator14395No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 22 200123 years325th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
4th May 24 14:0028th May 22 23:44LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Chester
Signature
Last league derby at Central Park 5/9/1999: Wigan 28 St. Helens 20
Last league derby at Knowsley Road 2/4/2010: St. Helens 10 Wigan 18
Moderator

Re: How do cutbacks save economies? : Sat Oct 13, 2012 1:39 am  
Richie wrote:
If we sell that server as a service, then in the whole wrap up of "what is the UK economy" then it counts as a service. Even though in both cases we have built a server and it's utilised in the same way, just charged differently.


That is the point. It's charged differently. How you charge for it doesn't alter whether you are a manufacturer or a service company. If BMW only leased their cars as opposed to selling them they would not become a service company. They would still be manufacturing the cars.

I suspect though that your company doesn't actually manufacture anything. It just plugs components manufactured by other companies together to make a server. That is not the same thing as manufacturing.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman37704No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
May 25 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
7th Aug 18 19:077th Aug 18 19:06LINK
Milestone Posts
30000
40000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Zummerzet, where the zoider apples grow
Signature
The older I get, the better I was

Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't

I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."

cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan

Re: How do cutbacks save economies? : Sat Oct 13, 2012 7:23 am  
samwire wrote:

just a few quick questions. when we've trained up all these home insulators, the ones who are rubbish at it, they fall through the ceilings and stuff like that, what happens when they can't get any work? then you've got those already doing this job who suddenly see their income drop as more flood the market, do we dole out the money to them too?



Here's a way to spend our way out of recession.

Government, local and national, "own" thousands of hectares of land suitable for housing development (I say "own" but in reality they are only custodians of what belongs to us, the nation). If this land was leased at peppercorn rents to charities and other not-for-profit organisations, they could then attract the necessary investment from institutional investors, like insurance companies and pension funds, to cover the cost of building much needed housing. Remember, there is a very real shortage of truly "affordable" housing.

The cost of construction (labour and materials), of a new house is around 40% of the final value, the balance being the cost of the land itself. These houses could then be rented out at truly affordable rents of 50% of the prevailing rate. The institutional investors would see a far better return on their capital than if they invested in government bonds and with a 99 year lease, they would also have similar or better security as if they'd invested in gilts. These houses should carry a cast-iron convenant that prevents any future "right to buy" schemes, they and the land they sit upon should remain mutually owned.

Quite apart from mitigating the housing shortage, the knock-on effects would be an increase in direct labour for construction and provision of infrastructure, this then feeds into increased employment in industries supplying construction, such as brick-making, timber, plumbing, electrical equipment etc. Each new home will also require to be furnished and carpeted, so more people employed in manufacturing and selling these items.

As each new person comes off the dole and into employment, the exchequer wins by not having to pay benefits and hopefully (depending on their wage), gaining tax & NI receipts. As each new home is rented, at these truly affordable rents, the exchequer also gains by reducing the amount of housing benefit paid. It's also worth pointing out that it is not the claimant who benefits from HB payments, it is his (invariably private), landlord. Privately-owned rented properties would also see reductions in revenues as "the market" drives down private rents to match those of the mutual-property rents.

Of course there will be losers:

The way UK banks are currently structured, they view 25 year mortgages as long term, so they'd probably lose out to institutional investors or foreign banks (who are not averse to long-term investment).

Private landlords would see a reduction in their rent receipts, as would the letting agents who leech off the back of them. But I strongly contend that th overall benefits to the nation far outweigh these "problems".

The only thing preventing this happening is dogmatic ideology, not surprising when you look at the number of MPs who are buy-to-let landlords and the influence on those same MPs of the financial sector. Instead, we now see proposals to convert "social housing" to "affordable housing". You may think there's little difference between the two but THIS LINK shows that there is a very real difference and you have to wonder at the mentality of raising rents from "social" to "affordable" and basically funding the difference through housing benefit. That's the politics and economics of the madhouse.
samwire wrote:

just a few quick questions. when we've trained up all these home insulators, the ones who are rubbish at it, they fall through the ceilings and stuff like that, what happens when they can't get any work? then you've got those already doing this job who suddenly see their income drop as more flood the market, do we dole out the money to them too?



Here's a way to spend our way out of recession.

Government, local and national, "own" thousands of hectares of land suitable for housing development (I say "own" but in reality they are only custodians of what belongs to us, the nation). If this land was leased at peppercorn rents to charities and other not-for-profit organisations, they could then attract the necessary investment from institutional investors, like insurance companies and pension funds, to cover the cost of building much needed housing. Remember, there is a very real shortage of truly "affordable" housing.

The cost of construction (labour and materials), of a new house is around 40% of the final value, the balance being the cost of the land itself. These houses could then be rented out at truly affordable rents of 50% of the prevailing rate. The institutional investors would see a far better return on their capital than if they invested in government bonds and with a 99 year lease, they would also have similar or better security as if they'd invested in gilts. These houses should carry a cast-iron convenant that prevents any future "right to buy" schemes, they and the land they sit upon should remain mutually owned.

Quite apart from mitigating the housing shortage, the knock-on effects would be an increase in direct labour for construction and provision of infrastructure, this then feeds into increased employment in industries supplying construction, such as brick-making, timber, plumbing, electrical equipment etc. Each new home will also require to be furnished and carpeted, so more people employed in manufacturing and selling these items.

As each new person comes off the dole and into employment, the exchequer wins by not having to pay benefits and hopefully (depending on their wage), gaining tax & NI receipts. As each new home is rented, at these truly affordable rents, the exchequer also gains by reducing the amount of housing benefit paid. It's also worth pointing out that it is not the claimant who benefits from HB payments, it is his (invariably private), landlord. Privately-owned rented properties would also see reductions in revenues as "the market" drives down private rents to match those of the mutual-property rents.

Of course there will be losers:

The way UK banks are currently structured, they view 25 year mortgages as long term, so they'd probably lose out to institutional investors or foreign banks (who are not averse to long-term investment).

Private landlords would see a reduction in their rent receipts, as would the letting agents who leech off the back of them. But I strongly contend that th overall benefits to the nation far outweigh these "problems".

The only thing preventing this happening is dogmatic ideology, not surprising when you look at the number of MPs who are buy-to-let landlords and the influence on those same MPs of the financial sector. Instead, we now see proposals to convert "social housing" to "affordable housing". You may think there's little difference between the two but THIS LINK shows that there is a very real difference and you have to wonder at the mentality of raising rents from "social" to "affordable" and basically funding the difference through housing benefit. That's the politics and economics of the madhouse.
Last edited by cod'ead on Sat Oct 13, 2012 9:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 159 guests

REPLY

Subject: 
Message:
   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...

Return to The Sin Bin


RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
17m
Film game
Boss Hog
6065
53m
Sports Personality of the Year
Wires71
13
60m
2025 Recruitment
Pyrah123
261
Recent
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
chapylad
2655
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
7s
Transfer Talk V5
chapylad
567
9s
New Players
Torbreck
154
19s
Shirt reveal coming soon
KevW60349
71
1m
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
The Dentist
4086
1m
Accounts
Faxlore
186
1m
2025 Kit
Bully_Boxer
28
1m
2025 Recruitment
Pyrah123
261
2m
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
chapylad
2655
2m
Salford
karetaker
73
2m
Christmas Party Night B Vue tonight cancelled
Dunkirk Spir
3
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Doug Laughton
batleyrhino
10
TODAY
Sports Personality of the Year
Wires71
13
TODAY
Forget-me-not Childrens hospice
H.G.S.A
1
TODAY
All time academy produced Super league era side
MjM
3
TODAY
Wigan warriors 2022 away shirt
WWste
4
TODAY
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
TonyM19
4
TODAY
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
Zig
8
TODAY
Rule Changes
Rugby Raider
5
TODAY
Player Contracts
Trojan Horse
6
TODAY
Fans Forum 12 Dec 11th
Dunkirk Spir
3
TODAY
Laurie Daley returns as NSW origin coach
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
2025 Challenge Cup
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Challenge Cup
BigTime
6
TODAY
Friendlies
Deadcowboys1
3
TODAY
Sam Luckley likely to miss the beginning of new season
Huddersfield
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
RLFANS Match Centre
Matches on TV
Thu 13th Feb
SL
20:00
Wigan-Leigh
Fri 14th Feb
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Castleford
SL
20:00
Catalans-Hull FC
Sat 15th Feb
SL
15:00
Leeds - Wakefield
SL
17:30
St.Helens-Salford
Sun 16th Feb
SL
15:00
Huddersfield-Warrington
Thu 20th Feb
SL
20:00
Wakefield - Hull KR
Fri 21st Feb
SL
20:00
Warrington-Catalans
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Wigan
Sat 22nd Feb
SL
15:00
Salford-Leeds
SL
20:00
Castleford-St.Helens
Sun 23rd Feb
SL
14:30
Leigh-Huddersfield
Fri 28th Feb
SL
20:00
Huddersfield-Hull FC
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Salford
SL
20:00
Leigh-Catalans
Sat 1st Mar
SL
14:30
Wakefield - St.Helens
SL
21:30
Wigan-Warrington
Sun 2nd Mar
SL
15:00
Leeds-Castleford
Thu 6th Mar
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Leigh
Fri 7th Mar
SL
20:00
Castleford-Salford
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wigan 29 768 338 430 48
Hull KR 29 731 344 387 44
Warrington 29 769 351 418 42
Leigh 29 580 442 138 33
Salford 28 556 561 -5 32
St.Helens 28 618 411 207 30
 
Catalans 27 475 427 48 30
Leeds 27 530 488 42 28
Huddersfield 27 468 658 -190 20
Castleford 27 425 735 -310 15
Hull FC 27 328 894 -566 6
LondonB 27 317 916 -599 6
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wakefield 27 1032 275 757 52
Toulouse 26 765 388 377 37
Bradford 28 723 420 303 36
York 29 695 501 194 32
Widnes 27 561 502 59 29
Featherstone 27 634 525 109 28
 
Sheffield 26 626 526 100 28
Doncaster 26 498 619 -121 25
Halifax 26 509 650 -141 22
Batley 26 422 591 -169 22
Swinton 28 484 676 -192 20
Barrow 25 442 720 -278 19
Whitehaven 25 437 826 -389 18
Dewsbury 27 348 879 -531 4
Hunslet 1 6 10 -4 0
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
17m
Film game
Boss Hog
6065
53m
Sports Personality of the Year
Wires71
13
60m
2025 Recruitment
Pyrah123
261
Recent
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
chapylad
2655
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
7s
Transfer Talk V5
chapylad
567
9s
New Players
Torbreck
154
19s
Shirt reveal coming soon
KevW60349
71
1m
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
The Dentist
4086
1m
Accounts
Faxlore
186
1m
2025 Kit
Bully_Boxer
28
1m
2025 Recruitment
Pyrah123
261
2m
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
chapylad
2655
2m
Salford
karetaker
73
2m
Christmas Party Night B Vue tonight cancelled
Dunkirk Spir
3
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Doug Laughton
batleyrhino
10
TODAY
Sports Personality of the Year
Wires71
13
TODAY
Forget-me-not Childrens hospice
H.G.S.A
1
TODAY
All time academy produced Super league era side
MjM
3
TODAY
Wigan warriors 2022 away shirt
WWste
4
TODAY
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
TonyM19
4
TODAY
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
Zig
8
TODAY
Rule Changes
Rugby Raider
5
TODAY
Player Contracts
Trojan Horse
6
TODAY
Fans Forum 12 Dec 11th
Dunkirk Spir
3
TODAY
Laurie Daley returns as NSW origin coach
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
2025 Challenge Cup
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Challenge Cup
BigTime
6
TODAY
Friendlies
Deadcowboys1
3
TODAY
Sam Luckley likely to miss the beginning of new season
Huddersfield
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!