LeighGionaire wrote:
The Establishment must truly hate Corbyn.
Latest smear attempt is he's an anti-semite apparently.
What I find amusing is that some of my friends who have been veering towards UKIP are warming to him because of the Establishments hatred of him. Now if he could be convinced to end the free movement of labour I think he could actually win an election for the Labour Party.
Hardly the first time that anti-Semitism has been flung around as an accusation – and vbfg is completely right in his analysis of this being overdone.
However, partly because he had never been a serious 'contender' for the leadership previously, once of the main problems with Corbyn is that he has no established team around him. The nature of today's UK political scene is Spads and Wonks etc. And because, from day one, people in the party (primarily, but not exculsively, the Parliamentary party) worked against him, this feels unreasonable.
Unfortunately – and from a personal perspective, I think that he has brough important issues to the fore (the need to build social housing being but one) he has few leadership skills and has appointed a 'team' on the basis of an understandablly defensive response to much from the rest of the PLP.
The possibility – and it is only that – that we might face a GE in the autumn does, however, urgently raise the issue of his electability beyond the activists and new members – and yes, there have been many new members since his leadership began.
The party's biggest problem is not an easy one to solve: a swathe of the mainstream media, having denigrated Ed Miliband for how he ate a sandwich, and then invented a Labour-SNP coalition, has now decided that truth is no longer a problem.
In the case of Corbyn, they now simply ignore his presence at, say, loads of Remain events – thus he is 'doing nothing'.
All sides flawed. The whole thing a mess. The People of the UK not actually being treated as the main concern.