Re: Baroness Warsi : Tue May 08, 2012 4:39 pm  

Dally wrote: Unlike "Blair's Babes" then. How many of those "babes" were elevated to the HoL in the first month of his permiership? Last time I looked they were all elected fairly in a contested general election Here they are

Dally wrote: Unlike "Blair's Babes" then. How many of those "babes" were elevated to the HoL in the first month of his permiership? Last time I looked they were all elected fairly in a contested general election Here they are

Re: Baroness Warsi : Tue May 08, 2012 4:53 pm  

... and didn't they do well! Flipping houses, etc. No, they were really promoted above what they mertited. Certainly not, for example, Jacqui Smith.

Breivik Trial thread : Tue May 08, 2012 5:19 pm  

Smith was democratically elected by her constituents, even though she proved a liability Dally. At least she tried to spice up her marriage by signing up to a bit of pay-per-view action. Unlike the Baroness who was banging somebody elses husband.

Re: Baroness Warsi : Tue May 08, 2012 7:09 pm  

Dally wrote:

... and didn't they do well! Flipping houses, etc. No, they were really promoted above what they mertited. Certainly not, for example, Jacqui Smith.

Have you been at Mrs D's cooking sherry?

Re: Baroness Warsi : Wed May 09, 2012 9:53 pm  

She's just been on Newsnight defending the Queens speech. Jesus wept, she can talk. And 0% of it was any good. Apparently the 5% cut in top rate tax will encourage investment in London. Not the rest of the UK, just London

Re: Baroness Warsi : Wed May 09, 2012 9:58 pm  

Chris28 wrote:

She's just been on Newsnight defending the Queens speech. Jesus wept, she can talk. And 0% of it was any good. Apparently the 5% cut in top rate tax will encourage investment in London. Not the rest of the UK, just London

Sadiq Khan didn't have to say anything at all, she just kept burying herself everytime she opened her gob.

She really is the best thing that has happened to Labour in many years, even Paxman was visibly shaking his head at times

Re: London v Hull at Gillingham : Sun May 27, 2012 10:08 am  

Oh dear. Looks like she's up the creek without a paddle....Another inspired selection decision by 'Call me Dave'.

Re: London v Hull at Gillingham : Sun May 27, 2012 10:22 am  

WIZEB wrote:

Oh dear. Looks like she's up the creek without a paddle....Another inspired selection decision by 'Call me Dave'.

Of course she's not, it was an "oversight" so thats ok

See how much Asda and the courts like my "oversight" next week when I walk out with a trolly full of shopping I haven't paid for.

Re: Baroness Warsi : Sun May 27, 2012 11:29 am  

She's been banging on about capping housing benefit at £96 a week, while she's been trousering £165 a day for a gaff she don't even live in

Re: London v Hull at Gillingham : Sun May 27, 2012 11:38 am  

cod'ead wrote:

She's been banging on about capping housing benefit at £96 a week, while she's been trousering £165 a day for a gaff she don't even live in

Not bad for a minister without portfolio. Thieving money out of the public purse and she doesn't even need to get herself elected. A bit of bird like Morley and the rest? I doubt it!