Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm  

TheButcher wrote:

:lol:

That's actually quite good.

He could of course have put a Life magazine on a Mars bar.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Wed Feb 17, 2016 7:06 pm  

Hahaha watch this very expensive Firework

Hahaha watch this very expensive Firework

[Kosh]

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Wed Feb 17, 2016 7:37 pm  

This thread is pure comedy gold.

I love it when people with no idea about science try to 'debunk' scientific evidence. Hilarity ensues.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Wed Feb 17, 2016 11:08 pm  

Kosh wrote:

This thread is pure comedy gold.

I love it when people with no idea about science try to 'debunk' scientific evidence. Hilarity ensues.

I personally see it as funny, but at the same time very sad.
Sad that people have such a rubbish grasp of Science and can't or won't see the holes in their logic.
Then as some kind of bizarre defence call scientific folk faithists.
Faith has very little to do with it.

There is not a single poster on here that has tried to use Science to back up their mischief theories that has not made themselves look stupid and inadequate.
Not one.

Get ready for a cap fitting session.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:40 am  

FLAT STANLEY wrote: Hahaha watch this very expensive Firework Stan and his dopey mentors don't understand that rockets launch UPWARDS! Taking the case of Apollo 11 on its way to the moon, it broke the sound barrier at an altitude of 7.96km or almost 5 miles. Don't believe me? ...just watch! As the sound cone of a sonic boom propagates perpendicular to the rocket, by the time it reached the ocean it would be several dozen miles away from the launch site, and such sound as did make it to sea level would be overwhelmed by the sound of the rocket engine. But your idiot mentors who publish such drivel don't bother to even try to read up on the very basics of what a sonic boom is, or how it propagates, they're too busy weeing their pants cos they think they found yet another 'thing'. The only question is, how can you keep falling for it? How can you repeatedly humiliate yourself by being so endlessly gullible? Poor Stan.

FLAT STANLEY wrote: Hahaha watch this very expensive Firework Stan and his dopey mentors don't understand that rockets launch UPWARDS! Taking the case of Apollo 11 on its way to the moon, it broke the sound barrier at an altitude of 7.96km or almost 5 miles. Don't believe me? ...just watch! As the sound cone of a sonic boom propagates perpendicular to the rocket, by the time it reached the ocean it would be several dozen miles away from the launch site, and such sound as did make it to sea level would be overwhelmed by the sound of the rocket engine. But your idiot mentors who publish such drivel don't bother to even try to read up on the very basics of what a sonic boom is, or how it propagates, they're too busy weeing their pants cos they think they found yet another 'thing'. The only question is, how can you keep falling for it? How can you repeatedly humiliate yourself by being so endlessly gullible? Poor Stan.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Thu Feb 18, 2016 10:53 am  

Thank Goodness this thread is up and running again, and my fears that the X Files new series had replaced all conspiracy theories on here, are unfounded.
I was beginning to miss my daily 'fix'.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:15 pm  

Kosh wrote:

This thread is pure comedy gold.

I love it when people with no idea about science try to 'debunk' scientific evidence. Hilarity ensues.

I agree its pure comedy gold watching a glorified firework blown to oblivion. The only evidence of science is the lack of it .

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Thu Feb 18, 2016 4:18 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

I agree its pure comedy gold watching a glorified firework blown to oblivion. ...

How you must have laughed then at the Challenger disaster. And I suppose Columbia disintegrating on re-entry cracked you up too.

Nice.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Thu Feb 18, 2016 4:35 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

How you must have laughed then at the Challenger disaster. And I suppose Columbia disintegrating on re-entry cracked you up too.

Nice.

And Apollo 13 not going to plan.
Can you imagine rubbish hoaxes like these, that don't really work?
Except of course it is all planned to make the real hoaxes more believable.
I mean, in the hoax mastermind's devious brain it wouldn't do to have all hoaxes running perfectly would it?
Who would fall for them?
Gotta have a few go wrong to prove the rule.
So Stan is not fooled by these exceptions... no way!
They are all hoaxes ... everything in life is a fooking hoax ... everything!
Apart, of course, from religion.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Thu Feb 18, 2016 5:46 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

How you must have laughed then at the Challenger disaster. .

The so called Challenger disaster is a prime example of NASA's deceitfulness. The crew wasn't even on board that mission there's plenty of evidence out in the field with regards to the Actornaughts still living today. NASA always fake their entry/re-entry missions. Nothing escapes the firmament.

To the people saying why fake the deaths and the explosion, well that firework/rocket wasn't supposed to explode. This was going to be a typical NASA hoax where they send a firework/rocket up and out of sight and then lie and say they are on the shuttle. Once it blew up they were screwed. They couldn't say "oh everyone survived and is perfectly okay", so they had to just hide the teachers for a while until everyone forgot and then sent them back out to teach. The rocket wasn't supposed to explode. That's how we know fireworks/rockets are totally unmanned and remote controlled. Simples