Another day and yet more sleaze. This time Boris and the Great Exhibition sponsored by the man funding the flat. I think it is now just called Thursday because of the number of situations cropping up on a daily basis.

I think it's just (another) coincidence.
It would be wrong to think that a Troy donor and the bloke who paid for Bojo's flat refurb, would be trying to buy influence or favour.

What happened on Tuesday and Wednesday? no fibbing either big brothers watching you.

Tuesday de Pffell lied about how he left the finances of TFL which despite being pointed out many times he continues to peddle the same lie. Wednesday was PMQ when he lied to parliament on numerous topics and when he was given an opportunity to correct the record he sat down.
I hope that answers your question squire.

Boris is simply a laughing stock - his excuses are lame and represent the office of PM in a terrible light. The less said about his concubine the better

Suppose It's too early in the day to ask about Friday, or have you done your research already

Which concubine you on about here zoom boom?

You asked about Tuesday and Wednesday and I gave you examples. In respect of Friday we now have the question of did he offer to help the flat donor with arranging a government backed exhibition. It is not very hard and definitely doesn’t need research, I bet even you could find it if you wanted to but I guess you don’t because everyday he makes your support look badly advised.

Thanks for the examples btw, just one thing I find puzzling and contradictory, if it's not very hard and doesn't need research, why are you now asking the question of did he offer to help the flat donor with arranging a government backed exhibition, which leads me to think you haven't done your research and have reverted back to type, blagging your way through again, thoroughly disappointing

It is only possible to ask when the attempt to cover it up comes to life light which in this case was because he was having to deal with another attempted cover up. The evidence he tried to hide from the first investigation was released to a second investigation disclosing a possible third which is so new it is still to be investigated. I am afraid not rocket science even you could find it but I guess you don’t because he makes you look a fool to continue to defend his actions.

Not really sure what to make of your explanation under lined as it looks like you don't either, possibly another botched job in your research.
Surely would it not be myself what makes me look foolish in my defence of Mr Johnson? but you know as well as I do that I have not defended him but simply asked you to defend your usual accusations against him, nice to see your still playing the guessing game again

Was he reinvestigated for the first omission yes because he had not told the investigator the whole truth.
Was the Conservative party investigated for the actions they took defending de Pfeffel YES
The second investigation was provided with evidence that was released to the public yesterday which immediately raised additional questions regarding his actions.
I cannot make it much simpler but you keep denying the facts he lied and continues to do so and I wonder other than you how many on here think you do not defend his actions.