Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:41 am  

Sheldon wrote: I haven't a problem with opinions as long as they're based on facts. Admirably 'utopian'. Ballocks makes the world go round. He's probably far more factual than many others in higher political office. That's why he can be. Here's one then........... How many hundreds of thousands of innocent lives were lost because of these two lying? Suppose it was just them putting their spin on it? At least we've democracised Iraq. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18950706

Sheldon wrote: I haven't a problem with opinions as long as they're based on facts. Admirably 'utopian'. Ballocks makes the world go round. He's probably far more factual than many others in higher political office. That's why he can be. Here's one then........... How many hundreds of thousands of innocent lives were lost because of these two lying? Suppose it was just them putting their spin on it? At least we've democracised Iraq. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18950706

Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Tue Sep 04, 2012 6:48 am  

Mintball wrote: You know perfectly well, my dear WIZEB, that I agree with Desmond Tutu on the issue of Blair and friends over Iraq, and have been saying so for some years. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/03/tony-blair-the-hague-iraq-war

Mintball wrote: You know perfectly well, my dear WIZEB, that I agree with Desmond Tutu on the issue of Blair and friends over Iraq, and have been saying so for some years. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/03/tony-blair-the-hague-iraq-war

Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:38 am  

WIZEB wrote: Admirably 'utopian'. Ballocks makes the world go round. He's probably far more factual than many others in higher political office. That's why he can be. Here's one then........... How many hundreds of thousands of innocent lives were lost because of these two lying? Suppose it was just them putting their spin on it? At least we've democracised Iraq. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18950706 I never mentioned either of them, are you suggesting he can spin how he wants because others do?

WIZEB wrote: Admirably 'utopian'. Ballocks makes the world go round. He's probably far more factual than many others in higher political office. That's why he can be. Here's one then........... How many hundreds of thousands of innocent lives were lost because of these two lying? Suppose it was just them putting their spin on it? At least we've democracised Iraq. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18950706 I never mentioned either of them, are you suggesting he can spin how he wants because others do?

Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:43 am  

Sheldon wrote:

I never mentioned either of them, are you suggesting he can spin how he wants because others do?

No, just that the world we now live in virtually depends upon it, and that anybody who doesn't get that, is ridiculously naive.

Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:49 am  

I know it's part of the world, I just don't like it.

And I don't expect to watch films that are virtually propaganda.

Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Tue Sep 04, 2012 8:11 am  

Sheldon wrote:

I know it's part of the world, I just don't like it.

And I don't expect to watch films that are virtually propaganda.

I suggest you stick to the status quo of ABC news then if Mr Moore challenges your sensitivies.

Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Tue Sep 04, 2012 8:14 am  

WIZEB wrote:

I suggest you stick to the status quo of ABC news then if Mr Moore challenges your sensitivies.

Only when he lies.

Lets face it you don't have to lie to make those 2 look like "nice people".

Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Tue Sep 04, 2012 8:22 am  

Back to t'topic. Daily polltacker. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-19415745 Neck and neck.

Back to t'topic. Daily polltacker. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-19415745 Neck and neck.

Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Tue Sep 04, 2012 11:20 am  

It'll be ok, the christians will save the world... http://commit2vote2012.com/ Now the thing is, you might expect that would mean lots of votes for Obama, and social care, and suffer the meek to come to me for healthcare and all that jazz... But, That link was posted on Facebook by someone I know, a Utah resident, a mormon, and as we already all know, Utah mormons tend to believe that Romney isn't quite going far enough with his plans to scrap ObamaCare, they'd prefer it if he scrapped tax full stop, "don't take the money off us to give to poor people, we'll pay for everything ourselves thank you", its yet another baffling American paradox that those who are rabidly christian (not only the mormons) are often the least socially aware or socially caring, the collection trays in their churches must be empty every week.

It'll be ok, the christians will save the world... http://commit2vote2012.com/ Now the thing is, you might expect that would mean lots of votes for Obama, and social care, and suffer the meek to come to me for healthcare and all that jazz... But, That link was posted on Facebook by someone I know, a Utah resident, a mormon, and as we already all know, Utah mormons tend to believe that Romney isn't quite going far enough with his plans to scrap ObamaCare, they'd prefer it if he scrapped tax full stop, "don't take the money off us to give to poor people, we'll pay for everything ourselves thank you", its yet another baffling American paradox that those who are rabidly christian (not only the mormons) are often the least socially aware or socially caring, the collection trays in their churches must be empty every week.

[Kosh]

Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Tue Sep 04, 2012 11:32 am  

WIZEB wrote:

I suggest you stick to the status quo of ABC news then if Mr Moore challenges your sensitivies.

Deary me.