Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Thu Nov 24, 2011 4:30 pm  

liedetector wrote:

One mans guff is another mans sense.

After your pathetic squealing earlier, perhaps you'd like to post a presponse - or is that as considered as you can manage?

Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Thu Nov 24, 2011 4:36 pm  

liedetector wrote:

One mans guff is another mans sense.

You didn't answer my question either. Will you be willing to help a sick and disabled person to earn their "free money"?

Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Thu Nov 24, 2011 4:40 pm  

Why do want to put people out of existing jobs, for them to be done by people on benefits?

Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Thu Nov 24, 2011 5:32 pm  

liedetector wrote:

I think its a brilliant idea. Id have the dole wollers helping local government for their payments. No such thing as a free lunch and all that.

And the poor sod's who want a job but due to this won't be able to get one can just go and spin I guess.

[tb]

Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Thu Nov 24, 2011 6:35 pm  

Sal Paradise wrote: bet Tesco pays significantly more into the taxation pot in corporation tax and employer NI that 99.9% of all businesses in the UK - Tescos are every bit as much a tax payer as Mintball. or possibly not

Sal Paradise wrote: bet Tesco pays significantly more into the taxation pot in corporation tax and employer NI that 99.9% of all businesses in the UK - Tescos are every bit as much a tax payer as Mintball. or possibly not

Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Thu Nov 24, 2011 6:38 pm  

Mintball wrote:

After your pathetic squealing earlier, perhaps you'd like to post a presponse - or is that as considered as you can manage?

Is that like getting your retaliation in first?

Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Thu Nov 24, 2011 6:57 pm  

Stand-Offish wrote:

Is that like getting your retaliation in first?

Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:10 pm  

tb wrote: or possibly not no, not them m'lud

tb wrote: or possibly not no, not them m'lud

Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Fri Nov 25, 2011 12:27 am  

Just to get by.

Just to get by.

Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Fri Nov 25, 2011 8:11 am  

tb wrote: or possibly not In the last set of published accounts Y/E 26/2/11 the company paid 864m in corporation tax add to that the employers NI which will be between 750m-1bn I would suggest they are making a substantial contribution to the tax revenues of this country. Obviously they don't count in you and your lady's consideration of who are exactly the tax payers!! As usual these simple facts are lost in your big company bashing crusade!!

tb wrote: or possibly not In the last set of published accounts Y/E 26/2/11 the company paid 864m in corporation tax add to that the employers NI which will be between 750m-1bn I would suggest they are making a substantial contribution to the tax revenues of this country. Obviously they don't count in you and your lady's consideration of who are exactly the tax payers!! As usual these simple facts are lost in your big company bashing crusade!!