Re: Coalition to break? : Sat Aug 18, 2012 10:10 pm  

Big Graeme wrote:

I did, at the time, on the thread in question. HTH.

Now, how about you answer questions aimed at you rather than try and divert attention...

No you didn't you refused.

Re: Coalition to break? : Sat Aug 18, 2012 10:19 pm  

Him wrote:

Except that wasn't a debate, that was you sticking your head in the sand and insisting black was white. Again, if you want to feel like you have integrity, then don't sidestep the issues that you yourself have brought up just because you're shown up by them.

No I provided evidence to back up my argument. You provided nothing.

Re: Coalition to break? : Sat Aug 18, 2012 11:31 pm  

Ajw71 wrote:

No I provided evidence to back up my argument. You provided nothing.

Oh dear. The level of your delusion rivals Kirkstallers.

Re: Coalition to break? : Sat Aug 18, 2012 11:54 pm  

Him wrote:

:lol: Oh dear. The level of your delusion rivals Kirkstallers.

Yeah polls of thousands of people but can be discounted just because you say so...

Kirkstaller believes in God, you think you are God.

Re: Coalition to break? : Sun Aug 19, 2012 12:03 am  

Ajw71 wrote:

Yeah polls of thousands of people but can be discounted just because you say so...

Kirkstaller believes in God, you think you are God.

It's been explained to you many times on the original thread by different people, if you persist on burying your head in the sand and blindly repeating the same rubbish then neither I nor Kirkstallers God can help you.

Re: Coalition to break? : Sun Aug 19, 2012 12:09 am  

Him wrote:

:lol: It's been explained to you many times on the original thread by different people, if you persist on burying your head in the sand and blindly repeating the same rubbish then neither I nor Kirkstallers God can help you.

Yes and it's been explained to you many times that you had nothing to support your opinion, and quite frankly your opinion alone was worth zip. You were nailed to the cross.

Re: Coalition to break? : Sun Aug 19, 2012 1:28 am  

No you don't understand AJW.

It's not about the argument that you put forward, it's about whether it agrees with the politics of certain members of RLFans.

Frankly I give up.

[DaveO]

Re: Coalition to break? : Sun Aug 19, 2012 2:27 am  

XBrettKennyX wrote:

It's not about the argument that you put forward, it's about whether it agrees with the politics of certain members of RLFans.

Given you put forward the weakest of arguments yourself why am I not surprised that...

Frankly I give up.

It is your only way out isn't it.

Re: Coalition to break? : Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:27 am  

XBrettKennyX wrote:

No you don't understand AJW.

It's not about the argument that you put forward, it's about whether it agrees with the politics of certain members of RLFans.

Frankly I give up.

Re: Coalition to break? : Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:35 am  

Ajw71 wrote:

Yes and it's been explained to you many times that you had nothing to support your opinion, and quite frankly your opinion alone was worth zip. You were nailed to the cross.

My opinion on what? That's what neither you nor dear old Sal could answer.