Re: Is Hull that bad? : Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:02 pm  

Dally wrote:

You're going back over months there. I'm sure if we did that in Hull's paper we'd fill the server up.

Prove it or shut it.
Simple really.

Re: Is Hull that bad? : Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:06 pm  

Anakin Skywalker wrote: Prove it or shut it. Simple really. Just a small part of the city for one month: http://www.police.uk/crime/?q=Hull,%20K ... od/2012-02 44.17 crimes / 1,000 people cf Central Widnes 16.97 /1,000 cf Where i live 3.35 / 1,000 So it does seem the people of Hull are rather unruly (to put it politely). To put it in perspective, a crime rate approx. 3 times higher than Birkenhead (aka Crack City).

Anakin Skywalker wrote: Prove it or shut it. Simple really. Just a small part of the city for one month: http://www.police.uk/crime/?q=Hull,%20K ... od/2012-02 44.17 crimes / 1,000 people cf Central Widnes 16.97 /1,000 cf Where i live 3.35 / 1,000 So it does seem the people of Hull are rather unruly (to put it politely). To put it in perspective, a crime rate approx. 3 times higher than Birkenhead (aka Crack City).

Re: Is Hull that bad? : Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:19 pm  

Dally wrote: Just a small part of the city for one month: http://www.police.uk/crime/?q=Hull,%20K ... od/2012-02 44.17 crimes / 1,000 people cf Central Widnes 16.97 /1,000 cf Where i live 3.35 / 1,000 So it does seem the people of Hull are rather unruly (to put it politely). To put it in perspective, a crime rate approx. 3 times higher than Birkenhead (aka Crack City). But yet another part of Hull is at 13.09. Which is rather funny when YOU have used the word 'perspective' eh! Infact that 'small area' you found is over double anywhere alse in Hull and infact most of the city is in single figures. So no so much of 'Just a small part' and more like the 'only part'. But you already knew this didn't you. Maybe I will use you logic and state that hull is a great place to live due to the fact that just a small part of Hull is at 3.85? Or would that not suit your agenda?

Dally wrote: Just a small part of the city for one month: http://www.police.uk/crime/?q=Hull,%20K ... od/2012-02 44.17 crimes / 1,000 people cf Central Widnes 16.97 /1,000 cf Where i live 3.35 / 1,000 So it does seem the people of Hull are rather unruly (to put it politely). To put it in perspective, a crime rate approx. 3 times higher than Birkenhead (aka Crack City). But yet another part of Hull is at 13.09. Which is rather funny when YOU have used the word 'perspective' eh! Infact that 'small area' you found is over double anywhere alse in Hull and infact most of the city is in single figures. So no so much of 'Just a small part' and more like the 'only part'. But you already knew this didn't you. Maybe I will use you logic and state that hull is a great place to live due to the fact that just a small part of Hull is at 3.85? Or would that not suit your agenda?

Re: Is Hull that bad? : Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:24 pm  

Anakin Skywalker wrote:

But yet another part of Hull is at 13.09.
Which is rather funny when YOU have used the word 'perspective' eh!

Of course, it'll vary. But I've tried Hackney, Brixton, several renowned areas of Liverpool, etc and central Hull has a rate several TIMES higher than all. Why? I'll try Salford next.

Re: Is Hull that bad? : Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:27 pm  

Salford, rate less than a third of Hull's.

I'll leave it to you to see if you can find somewhere with a higher rate.

Found one for you - I just thought of other cess-pits I'd visited and Cardiff came up trumps! not in England though.

Re: Is Hull that bad? : Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:31 pm  

Anakin Skywalker wrote: Dally wrote: Just a small part of the city for one month: http://www.police.uk/crime/?q=Hull,%20K ... od/2012-02 44.17 crimes / 1,000 people cf Central Widnes 16.97 /1,000 cf Where i live 3.35 / 1,000 So it does seem the people of Hull are rather unruly (to put it politely). To put it in perspective, a crime rate approx. 3 times higher than Birkenhead (aka Crack City). But yet another part of Hull is at 13.09. Which is rather funny when YOU have used the word 'perspective' eh! Infact that 'small area' you found is over double anywhere alse in Hull and infact most of the city is in single figures. So no so much of 'Just a small part' and more like the 'only part'. But you already knew this didn't you. Maybe I will use you logic and state that hull is a great place to live due to the fact that just a small part of Hull is at 3.85? Or would that not suit your agenda? You're wasting your time. Dally decides what his opinion is, then tries to manipulate the data to suit his agenda. Or omits to present any data whatsoever.

Anakin Skywalker wrote: Dally wrote: Just a small part of the city for one month: http://www.police.uk/crime/?q=Hull,%20K ... od/2012-02 44.17 crimes / 1,000 people cf Central Widnes 16.97 /1,000 cf Where i live 3.35 / 1,000 So it does seem the people of Hull are rather unruly (to put it politely). To put it in perspective, a crime rate approx. 3 times higher than Birkenhead (aka Crack City). But yet another part of Hull is at 13.09. Which is rather funny when YOU have used the word 'perspective' eh! Infact that 'small area' you found is over double anywhere alse in Hull and infact most of the city is in single figures. So no so much of 'Just a small part' and more like the 'only part'. But you already knew this didn't you. Maybe I will use you logic and state that hull is a great place to live due to the fact that just a small part of Hull is at 3.85? Or would that not suit your agenda? You're wasting your time. Dally decides what his opinion is, then tries to manipulate the data to suit his agenda. Or omits to present any data whatsoever.

Re: Is Hull that bad? : Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:31 pm  

Dally wrote:

Of course, it'll vary. But I've tried Hackney, Brixton, several renowned areas of Liverpool, etc and central Hull has a rate several TIMES higher than all. Why? I'll try Salford next.

Woah dont back pedal to much you may break you bike.
I mean let us not forget that you failed to mention you were talking about 'Central Hull' as you stated 'Just a small part'.
Maybe if you had been more clear in clarifiying your agenda folks may not be able to make you look a chump so easily.

Re: Is Hull that bad? : Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:34 pm  

Dally wrote:

Salford, rate less than a third of Hull's.

I'll leave it to you to see if you can find somewhere with a higher rate.

Found one for you - I just thought of other cess-pits I'd visited and Cardiff came up trumps! not in England though.

You do realise how much of a fool you sound right?
Again You seem to not understand your own arguement as you have stated 'Hull's' that isn't true as I have already stated.
Still At least it passes you some time.
Perhaps you could apply for a job in government after all they seem to be unable to make themselves look like anything but gibbering idiots too.

Re: Is Hull that bad? : Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:36 pm  

Anakin Skywalker wrote:

Woah dont back pedal to much you may break you bike.
I mean let us not forget that you failed to mention you were talking about 'Central Hull' as you stated 'Just a small part'.
Maybe if you had been more clear in clarifiying your agenda folks may not be able to make you look a chump so easily.

You are a prize one! You asked me to back up my assertion that Hull seemed to have a high crime rate. So I searched Hull - not surprisingly Central Hull came up. I am not familiar with the good / bad areas of Hull, so it's entirely reasonable. Hackney will probably have a population larger than Hull's and is a deprived inner city borough. I also searches areas like Birkenhead, Kirkby, Toxteth and Bootle - none came close to Hull.

Again, I ask - why?

Re: Is Hull that bad? : Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:37 pm  

Rock God X wrote:

You're wasting your time. Dally decides what his opinion is, then tries to manipulate the data to suit his agenda. Or omits to present any data whatsoever.

True but when a jumped up little twerp starts spouting rubbish I'm gunna call him on it.