Re: The Labour party leadership thread : Sun Sep 13, 2015 6:37 am  

Ajw71 wrote:

As if May wasn't good enough then this happens.

What, you continuing to post nonsense based on ignorance and dogma.

If I were you I would consider checking to see if there is a case against the education authority or maybe others for not teaching you how to think etc.

There are people around who care, probably much to your disappointment, but they can help you.

Re: The Labour party leadership thread : Sun Sep 13, 2015 7:10 am  

Leaguefan wrote:

What, you continuing to post nonsense based on ignorance and dogma.

If I were you I would consider checking to see if there is a case against the education authority or maybe others for not teaching you how to think etc.

There are people around who care, probably much to your disappointment, but they can help you.

You seriously think the re-emergence of "Keep the red flag flying" is going to endear Corbyn/Labour to the electorate? seriously you are another that needs a reality check. The emergence of McClusky on the stage at the victory parade should have been something Corbyn should have been looking to avoid. Re-nationalisation and increased union powers - who is seriously going to vote for that?

Re: The Labour party leadership thread : Sun Sep 13, 2015 7:58 am  

It makes the forthcoming period of politics interesting if just for farcical reasons. Astonishing what has happened.

Its great for the country that the Tories can draw up a long term plan for the country whilst Tom and Jerry spend each Sat attending demonstrations in Hyde Park dressed in Donkey Jackets.

Re: The Labour party leadership thread : Sun Sep 13, 2015 11:25 am  

Good to see Labour electing a white, middle class, male career politician.

Re: The Labour party leadership thread : Sun Sep 13, 2015 11:37 am  

Sal Paradise wrote:

You seriously think the re-emergence of "Keep the red flag flying" is going to endear Corbyn/Labour to the electorate? seriously you are another that needs a reality check. The emergence of McClusky on the stage at the victory parade should have been something Corbyn should have been looking to avoid. Re-nationalisation and increased union powers - who is seriously going to vote for that?

Given that absolute wages have plummeted in this country over the past few decades and the fact that unionised labour is consistently better paid than non-unionised - more than you might think.

Re: The Labour party leadership thread : Sun Sep 13, 2015 12:22 pm  

Mugwump wrote:

Given that absolute wages have plummeted in this country over the past few decades and the fact that unionised labour is consistently better paid than non-unionised - more than you might think.

I challenge you to prove the last statement. Union membership is falling - strange that - when the financial benefits in your strange mind are so obvious!!

Re: The Labour party leadership thread : Sun Sep 13, 2015 12:30 pm  

Sal Paradise wrote:

You seriously think the re-emergence of "Keep the red flag flying" is going to endear Corbyn/Labour to the electorate? seriously you are another that needs a reality check. The emergence of McClusky on the stage at the victory parade should have been something Corbyn should have been looking to avoid. Re-nationalisation and increased union powers - who is seriously going to vote for that?

Those increased "closed shop" unions called the BMA, fighting for their members regarding 7 day working, much to the annoyance of people who would like this. the " closed shop"
Law Society fighting the government regarding legal aid etc. The NFU having a go about decreased SUBSIDIES for their members. Need I go on? Don't forget these Union leaders are very well paid, just like the 1st divi on of the civil service.
Yeh unions holding the country to ransom! hypocrisy.
Like AJW, you are also a sad indictment of the education system which has let you down.
Help is available, you choice, but if you want to stay in a state of struggling to think, then your choice. You are missing out on so much.

Re: The Labour party leadership thread : Sun Sep 13, 2015 1:00 pm  

Sal Paradise wrote:

I challenge you to prove the last statement. Union membership is falling - strange that - when the financial benefits in your strange mind are so obvious!!

You "challenge" me?

Re: The Labour party leadership thread : Sun Sep 13, 2015 1:46 pm  

Sal Paradise wrote:

I challenge you to prove the last statement. Union membership is falling - strange that - when the financial benefits in your strange mind are so obvious!!

I have found it to be the case. If you don't have a unionised workforce the employer dictates what the payrise will be so if they say it's 0% that's what you get (as has happened to many over the past three decades).

Re: The Labour party leadership thread : Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:02 pm  

Leaguefan wrote:

Like AJW, you are also a sad indictment of the education system which has let you down.
Help is available, you choice, but if you want to stay in a state of struggling to think, then your choice. You are missing out on so much.

"You choice"? Did you and AJW get the same education? Or were you trying to belittle him/her because you've nothing left other than petty insults. Just write "WAAAHHHHH....Tories" in future it'll save time.