FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!

   WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Irvine Patnick RIP (rot in pieces)
::Off-topic discussion.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
All Time Great47951No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
May 10 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
6th Aug 17 19:0327th Jul 17 17:56LINK
Milestone Posts
40000
50000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Die Metropole
Signature
"You are working for Satan." Kirkstaller

"Dare to know!" Immanuel Kant

"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive" Elbert Hubbard

"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." Oscar Wilde

The Voluptuous Manifesto – thoughts on all sorts of stuff.

Re: Irvine Patnick RIP (rot in pieces) : Mon Jan 07, 2013 12:37 pm  
Sal Paradise wrote:
So every decision you make is so straight forward you do not require you to use your brain, you are effect an automon - but for most of us we need to consider other issues i.e. decision are 'subject' to outside considerations. I would suggest you are wrong in your 'nah' comment.

How do you explain Judicial law changes? and how do you explain the diversity of sentencing for very similar offences if the decision does not include some degree of subjectivity from the judge? If it were not the case you would only need the judge to ensure legal protocol and on conviction the sentence would already be known.


I think what you've hit on, possibly without realising it, is why so many people get irritated with the judicial system. They react in an emotional and subjective way to a case that they hear or read about, and then perhaps consider a sentence, which has been handed down according to very strict and obectively thought-out rules, is lighter than their subjective view would expect or prefer.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman18060No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 27 200223 years317th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
11th Jun 23 20:4411th Jun 23 20:53LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
On the road
Signature
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.

Re: Irvine Patnick RIP (rot in pieces) : Mon Jan 07, 2013 1:22 pm  
Mintball wrote:
I think what you've hit on, possibly without realising it, is why so many people get irritated with the judicial system. They react in an emotional and subjective way to a case that they hear or read about, and then perhaps consider a sentence, which has been handed down according to very strict and obectively thought-out rules, is lighter than their subjective view would expect or prefer.


I agree with your frustration at the judicial system - but I think it is the inconsistencies that are clearly evident that frustrate people. Take Chev Walker, Ben Cockayne and Leon Pryce, all were convicted of assault all first time offences all got differing sentences from custodial to suspended!! Anyone who saw the footage of Cockaynes would be shocked at the sentence he received. As for Pryce and his father's pleading letter - the less said the better!!

If you take time read the sentencing guidelines - one of its major aims was to achieve greater consistency in sentencing.
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman6038No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 10 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
3rd Mar 17 10:5527th Feb 17 17:36LINK
Milestone Posts
5000
10000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Bradford

Re: Irvine Patnick RIP (rot in pieces) : Mon Jan 07, 2013 2:00 pm  
Very few cases are identical. There are usually differences in the severity of the offense, the degrees of harm caused and the culpability of the offender. The offenders' circumstances are usually different, they show different levels of remorse and/or co-operation with the police and/or probation services.

Sentences will take into account how the defendent might have responded to previous sentences. Or whether they were on bail at the time of the offense. Defendents might enter guilty pleas at different stages in the proceedings. Financial penalties are based on the defendent's income, subject to caps.

Some defendents receive lighter sentences than they might otherwise have because of the basis on which they plead and whether the CPS decides its in the public interest to accept that plea rather than go to trial.

Sentencing isnt an exact science. Its not a case of entering all the facts into a computer and out pops a sentence. Judges exercise judgement. Sometimes their judgement seems to be inconsistent, although that might be at least partly down to how a particular case is reported.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Star3605No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 09 201212 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
20th May 16 14:5420th May 16 10:16LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Leeds
Signature
Someday everything is gonna be different, when I paint my masterpiece
----------------------------------------------------------
Online art gallery, selling original landscape artwork
----------------------------------------------------------
JerryChicken - The Blog
----------------------------------------------------------

Re: Irvine Patnick RIP (rot in pieces) : Mon Jan 07, 2013 2:44 pm  
Sal Paradise wrote:
I agree with your frustration at the judicial system - but I think it is the inconsistencies that are clearly evident that frustrate people. Take Chev Walker, Ben Cockayne and Leon Pryce, all were convicted of assault all first time offences all got differing sentences from custodial to suspended!! Anyone who saw the footage of Cockaynes would be shocked at the sentence he received. As for Pryce and his father's pleading letter - the less said the better!!

If you take time read the sentencing guidelines - one of its major aims was to achieve greater consistency in sentencing.


I used to have a link to "The Bench Book" which was the actual guidelines given to magistrates for the types of offences that you highlight, if you read the guide then you'll soon see why two cases of assault can attract totally different sentences, indeed you'll see why there is no such thing as a default sentence for assault, or indeed a "default" assault.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman28357
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 17 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
2nd May 24 20:2424th Oct 19 15:32LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
MACS0647-JD
Signature
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total

Re: Irvine Patnick RIP (rot in pieces) : Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:09 pm  
Sal Paradise wrote:
So every decision you make is so straight forward you do not require you to use your brain,

Eh? How did you leap the almost infinite chasm from "Virtually everything we do in life requires subjectivity," which I dispute, to that?

Weird.

Leaving that aside, yes every decision you make requires you to use your brain.

Sal Paradise wrote:
you are effect an automon -

Here's the interesting thing; what if you actually are? (I presume, automaton)

We all like to think that we are in control, and that we make reasoned choices about stuff, but do we?

First of all, whilst it is a subject of debate as to the precise percentage, your SUBCONSCIOUS brain deals with well over 90% of your activities. Indeed, many of the scientists at the cutting edge of research into consciousness suggest that your subconscious mind is really in charge, to all intents and purposes, and that your conscious mind is not much more than an interface with the outside world, it sort of learns and detects new outside stuff, but then handles it only for so long as it takes the subconscious mind to learn it, and after that, its role in that is finished, the subconscious has assimilated it, like some sort of Borg.

Now, we each are built according to our genome, and that includes our brains. Each decision must result in a yes or a no, so a simple binary system. I appreciate that if you have a complex decision to think about, the ultimate result may be the product of a zillion different matters being processed until eventually you arrive at a decision however ultimately when you have it figured out, that last synapse will then fire either a yes or a no, a zero or a 1, and you'll either do it, or you won't. What if, genetically, that signal, or the route of signals, was pre-disposed to a couple of 1 branches instead of a couple of zero branches, and so because you were made that way, you are ultimately bound to decide the other way?

This is if you believe, as I do, that the decision making process is just a complex neural physical activity. I don't believe there is anything else, i.e. nothing "non-physical" making an input.

Therefore it may be that every single thing you do, or don't do, is the inevitable result of your genetic make-up; for any given decision, because of how your genes are arranged, the pinball of decision CAN ONLY take one route, and whilst you think you "chose" X, it was, in fact, physically impossible for you to choose Y. Of course, you might "learn" from that, and next time, because of teh consequences, your brain might hae easioly re-arranged the synapses and the connections so that if given the same decision to make it would now be the opposite - but that is the equally a blueprint, and not a "decision" in the sense you have a true choice.

Sal Paradise wrote:
How do you explain Judicial law changes?

That's straightforward, there are many areas where either there is no statute, or else the situation is novel, or else on occasion a statute does turn out to be ambiguous, and in those sort of cases obviously we get what is usually termed "judge-made law". The point is that they can only do this if there isn't, in effect, a law passed by Parliament for that particular circumstance. If there is, they can't countermand it.

Sal Paradise wrote:
and how do you explain the diversity of sentencing for very similar offences if the decision does not include some degree of subjectivity from the judge? If it were not the case you would only need the judge to ensure legal protocol and on conviction the sentence would already be known.

I think you're unnecessarily introducing subjectivity into the sentencing concept. The judge HAS to be objective and the whole system is predicated on precedent, and consistency in sentencing.

No two offences and no two offenders are the same. The judge needs to decide where, within the range of sentencing options for that offence, it falls, and needs to decide where, within the scale of criminality, the defendant lies, both in terms of that particular offence, and his previous character and antecedents. Further, the judge has to give due weight to the mitigation put forward. How I would answer your question is that I believe most judges would carry out this complex analysis with objectivity, that is, doing their best to pass an appropriate sentence based on these objective guidelines etc. It is trite to say that the actual sentence itself must be subjective, from the perspective of the offender - it could hardly be anything but, as it is tailored only to him - but that does not mean the judge didn't act objectively.

And you could easily have a system where the sentence was already known. All parliament would need to do is prescribe fixed sentences for any given offence. The reason you might get a variation in sentence from one judge to another may lie in their genome (see above) more than any lack of objectivity on their part.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman18060No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 27 200223 years317th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
11th Jun 23 20:4411th Jun 23 20:53LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
On the road
Signature
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.

Re: Irvine Patnick RIP (rot in pieces) : Tue Jan 08, 2013 8:03 am  
Cibaman wrote:
Very few cases are identical. There are usually differences in the severity of the offense, the degrees of harm caused and the culpability of the offender. The offenders' circumstances are usually different, they show different levels of remorse and/or co-operation with the police and/or probation services.

Sentences will take into account how the defendent might have responded to previous sentences. Or whether they were on bail at the time of the offense. Defendents might enter guilty pleas at different stages in the proceedings. Financial penalties are based on the defendent's income, subject to caps.

Some defendents receive lighter sentences than they might otherwise have because of the basis on which they plead and whether the CPS decides its in the public interest to accept that plea rather than go to trial.

Sentencing isnt an exact science. Its not a case of entering all the facts into a computer and out pops a sentence. Judges exercise judgement. Sometimes their judgement seems to be inconsistent, although that might be at least partly down to how a particular case is reported.


At last - the last paragraph is what I have been trying to say all along, that sentencing is subjected to the views - albeit within certain guidelines - of judge.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman28357
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 17 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
2nd May 24 20:2424th Oct 19 15:32LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
MACS0647-JD
Signature
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total

Re: Irvine Patnick RIP (rot in pieces) : Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:28 pm  
Sal Paradise wrote:
At last - the last paragraph is what I have been trying to say all along, that sentencing is subjected to the views - albeit within certain guidelines - of judge.


But the emphasis you place is the wrong way round. The judge (indeed, any sentencing court ‘must follow’ any relevant sentencing guidelines unless it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so.

It is not the judge's personal views that are in any way relevant. They may or may not co-incide with the sentencing guidelines - there are frequent cases where the sentencer is reported as saying that they think their sentencing powers are insufficient, for example - but such a view is not a reason permitting them to depart from either the sentencing guidelines if any, or earlier sentencing authorities, if there happens to be no guideline published.

You might want to have a study here: http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/sentencing-guidelines.htm
Sal Paradise wrote:
At last - the last paragraph is what I have been trying to say all along, that sentencing is subjected to the views - albeit within certain guidelines - of judge.


But the emphasis you place is the wrong way round. The judge (indeed, any sentencing court ‘must follow’ any relevant sentencing guidelines unless it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so.

It is not the judge's personal views that are in any way relevant. They may or may not co-incide with the sentencing guidelines - there are frequent cases where the sentencer is reported as saying that they think their sentencing powers are insufficient, for example - but such a view is not a reason permitting them to depart from either the sentencing guidelines if any, or earlier sentencing authorities, if there happens to be no guideline published.

You might want to have a study here: http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/sentencing-guidelines.htm
Previous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 208 guests

REPLY

Subject: 
Message:
   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...

Return to The Sin Bin


RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
40m
Rumours and signings v9
MadDogg
28927
41m
Shirt reveal coming soon
BarnsleyGull
82
51m
Season pass roll call
Dave K.
48
59m
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
Cruncher
10
Recent
Film game
karetaker
6121
Recent
Open Trials
BigTime
4
Recent
Squad numbers 2025
imwakefieldt
68
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
59s
Sports Personality of the Year
rubber ducki
17
1m
Rumours and signings v9
MadDogg
28927
2m
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
40876
2m
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
leeds owl
2661
2m
Transfer chatter for 2025 - New Dec 1st tamper date
Dave K.
34
3m
Spirit of the Rhinos
Vic Mackie
16
3m
Squad 2025
faxcar
76
8m
Open Trials
BigTime
4
10m
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
Cruncher
10
11m
Super League
Dr Dreadnoug
34
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Hopes and Dreams for a New Season
Septimius Se
1
TODAY
Open Trials
BigTime
4
TODAY
Shareholder/Fans Forum
Wollo-Wollo-
2
TODAY
Elliot Michella extends contract
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
Christmas Party Night B Vue tonight cancelled
Dunkirk Spir
3
TODAY
Doug Laughton
rollin thund
12
TODAY
Sports Personality of the Year
rubber ducki
17
TODAY
Forget-me-not Childrens hospice
H.G.S.A
1
TODAY
All time academy produced Super league era side
rollin thund
5
TODAY
Wigan warriors 2022 away shirt
WWste
4
TODAY
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
Huddersfield
5
TODAY
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
Cruncher
10
TODAY
Rule Changes
Rugby Raider
5
TODAY
Player Contracts
Trojan Horse
6
TODAY
Fans Forum 12 Dec 11th
Dunkirk Spir
3
TODAY
Laurie Daley returns as NSW origin coach
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
2025 Challenge Cup
Wanderer
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
Captains Challenge for Televis..
286
England Women Las Vegas train-..
449
Opening Championship and Leagu..
615
2025 Betfred Super League Fixt..
1730
Magic Weekend 2025 - Back To N..
1011
England Beat Samoa To Take Tes..
1677
England's Women Demolish The W..
1532
England Beat Samoa Comfortably..
1758
Operational Rules Tribunal â..
1493
IMG-RFL club gradings released..
1728
Wakefield Trinity Win Champion..
2277
Hunslet Secure Promotion After..
2482
Trinity Into Play Off Final Af..
2722
Wigan Warriors Crowned Champio..
2274
York Valkyrie Win Back to Back..
2516
RLFANS Match Centre
Matches on TV
Thu 13th Feb
SL
20:00
Wigan-Leigh
Fri 14th Feb
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Castleford
SL
20:00
Catalans-Hull FC
Sat 15th Feb
SL
15:00
Leeds - Wakefield
SL
17:30
St.Helens-Salford
Sun 16th Feb
SL
15:00
Huddersfield-Warrington
Thu 20th Feb
SL
20:00
Wakefield - Hull KR
Fri 21st Feb
SL
20:00
Warrington-Catalans
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Wigan
Sat 22nd Feb
SL
15:00
Salford-Leeds
SL
20:00
Castleford-St.Helens
Sun 23rd Feb
SL
14:30
Leigh-Huddersfield
Fri 28th Feb
SL
20:00
Huddersfield-Hull FC
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Salford
SL
20:00
Leigh-Catalans
Sat 1st Mar
SL
14:30
Wakefield - St.Helens
SL
21:30
Wigan-Warrington
Sun 2nd Mar
SL
15:00
Leeds-Castleford
Thu 6th Mar
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Leigh
Fri 7th Mar
SL
20:00
Castleford-Salford
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wigan 29 768 338 430 48
Hull KR 29 731 344 387 44
Warrington 29 769 351 418 42
Leigh 29 580 442 138 33
Salford 28 556 561 -5 32
St.Helens 28 618 411 207 30
 
Catalans 27 475 427 48 30
Leeds 27 530 488 42 28
Huddersfield 27 468 658 -190 20
Castleford 27 425 735 -310 15
Hull FC 27 328 894 -566 6
LondonB 27 317 916 -599 6
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wakefield 27 1032 275 757 52
Toulouse 26 765 388 377 37
Bradford 28 723 420 303 36
York 29 695 501 194 32
Widnes 27 561 502 59 29
Featherstone 27 634 525 109 28
 
Sheffield 26 626 526 100 28
Doncaster 26 498 619 -121 25
Halifax 26 509 650 -141 22
Batley 26 422 591 -169 22
Swinton 28 484 676 -192 20
Barrow 25 442 720 -278 19
Whitehaven 25 437 826 -389 18
Dewsbury 27 348 879 -531 4
Hunslet 1 6 10 -4 0
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
40m
Rumours and signings v9
MadDogg
28927
41m
Shirt reveal coming soon
BarnsleyGull
82
51m
Season pass roll call
Dave K.
48
59m
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
Cruncher
10
Recent
Film game
karetaker
6121
Recent
Open Trials
BigTime
4
Recent
Squad numbers 2025
imwakefieldt
68
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
59s
Sports Personality of the Year
rubber ducki
17
1m
Rumours and signings v9
MadDogg
28927
2m
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
40876
2m
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
leeds owl
2661
2m
Transfer chatter for 2025 - New Dec 1st tamper date
Dave K.
34
3m
Spirit of the Rhinos
Vic Mackie
16
3m
Squad 2025
faxcar
76
8m
Open Trials
BigTime
4
10m
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
Cruncher
10
11m
Super League
Dr Dreadnoug
34
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Hopes and Dreams for a New Season
Septimius Se
1
TODAY
Open Trials
BigTime
4
TODAY
Shareholder/Fans Forum
Wollo-Wollo-
2
TODAY
Elliot Michella extends contract
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
Christmas Party Night B Vue tonight cancelled
Dunkirk Spir
3
TODAY
Doug Laughton
rollin thund
12
TODAY
Sports Personality of the Year
rubber ducki
17
TODAY
Forget-me-not Childrens hospice
H.G.S.A
1
TODAY
All time academy produced Super league era side
rollin thund
5
TODAY
Wigan warriors 2022 away shirt
WWste
4
TODAY
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
Huddersfield
5
TODAY
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
Cruncher
10
TODAY
Rule Changes
Rugby Raider
5
TODAY
Player Contracts
Trojan Horse
6
TODAY
Fans Forum 12 Dec 11th
Dunkirk Spir
3
TODAY
Laurie Daley returns as NSW origin coach
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
2025 Challenge Cup
Wanderer
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
Captains Challenge for Televis..
286
England Women Las Vegas train-..
449
Opening Championship and Leagu..
615
2025 Betfred Super League Fixt..
1730
Magic Weekend 2025 - Back To N..
1011
England Beat Samoa To Take Tes..
1677
England's Women Demolish The W..
1532
England Beat Samoa Comfortably..
1758
Operational Rules Tribunal â..
1493
IMG-RFL club gradings released..
1728
Wakefield Trinity Win Champion..
2277
Hunslet Secure Promotion After..
2482
Trinity Into Play Off Final Af..
2722
Wigan Warriors Crowned Champio..
2274
York Valkyrie Win Back to Back..
2516


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!