Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:25 pm  

Horatio Yed wrote:

I saw the other Milliband on question time, last week i think it was, they certainly picked the wrong one.

Blame the Unions for that then.

Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:32 pm  

Him wrote:

To go along with Donald Trump and Karl Rove little hissy fits it just makes the Obama win even funnier. The Trump one especially

Reading Trumps trumping tweets you just know that you are reading the ranting of a billionaire who has just lost a considerable amount of money that he "invested" in the belief that a Republican government would make him more shitloads of money in all sorts of deals and funny handshakes.

Its always funny when the mega rich lose big time on the casino wheels and then show how fixated they are with money.

There are more things to life than your fortune Donald.

Barbers for one thing.

Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:32 pm  

cod'ead wrote: True to form, batshit-loony Melanie Phillips has an apoplectic fit If she hadn't written that seriously it would be one of the most hilarious things ever. Its not funny to mock the afflicted though

cod'ead wrote: True to form, batshit-loony Melanie Phillips has an apoplectic fit If she hadn't written that seriously it would be one of the most hilarious things ever. Its not funny to mock the afflicted though

Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:41 pm  

Melanie Philips started out at the Guardian. So no surprise she is a complete loon. She went to the Daily Mail to try and mitigate it, which says a lot

Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Thu Nov 08, 2012 1:49 pm  

JerryChicken wrote:

Reading Trumps trumping tweets you just know that you are reading the ranting of a billionaire who has just lost a considerable amount of money that he "invested" in the belief that a Republican government would make him more shitloads of money in all sorts of deals and funny handshakes.

Its always funny when the mega rich lose big time on the casino wheels and then show how fixated they are with money.

There are more things to life than your fortune Donald.

Barbers for one thing.

It was just funny that because he didn't get the result he wanted that suddenly meant the US was no longer a democracy and somehow it was a false result.
It's also the funniest time to watch Fox News right now. You can tell they're just itching to constantly scream "F*CK THE LOT OF YOU!! ITS NOT FAIR!!" and then stomp off to their room. Also it's cringe making to hear them constantly saying how wonderful it is that the US is a democracy and that the US has this kind of thing. I sometimes think that they think the US is the only country in the world to hold elections and they they invented it.

Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Thu Nov 08, 2012 1:59 pm  

Stock market has taken a dive.

Hardly the response you would expect for a nation supposedly overjoyed about the re-election of Obama.

I prefer him over Romney but they hype is ridiculous. People are bigging this up like the second coming. Four more years. Four more years of what?

Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Thu Nov 08, 2012 2:03 pm  

People giving a crap about something other than their bank balance?

Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Thu Nov 08, 2012 2:09 pm  

Chris28 wrote:

People giving a crap about something other than their bank balance?

Possibly not. Since most people are moaning about the economy, which ultimately comes down to their bank balance.

Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Thu Nov 08, 2012 2:17 pm  

The Video Ref wrote:

Stock market has taken a dive.

Hardly the response you would expect for a nation supposedly overjoyed about the re-election of Obama.

I prefer him over Romney but they hype is ridiculous. People are bigging this up like the second coming. Four more years. Four more years of what?

The down on the US stock market is not due to Obama's re-election.

Re: OBAMA v ROMNEY : Thu Nov 08, 2012 2:52 pm  

cod'ead wrote: True to form, batshit-loony Melanie Phillips has an apoplectic fit As you say, true to form. Philips is a big fan of Zionism and Palestinian-bashing. If the taking-the-Book-of-Revelations-literally Bible-belt's favourite had won, Netanyahu would have had free rein. Not that Obama has had much success in getting Netanyahu to cease the ever-expanding Lebensraum across the West Bank, at least he wouldn't give it his blessing as Republicans have always done.

cod'ead wrote: True to form, batshit-loony Melanie Phillips has an apoplectic fit As you say, true to form. Philips is a big fan of Zionism and Palestinian-bashing. If the taking-the-Book-of-Revelations-literally Bible-belt's favourite had won, Netanyahu would have had free rein. Not that Obama has had much success in getting Netanyahu to cease the ever-expanding Lebensraum across the West Bank, at least he wouldn't give it his blessing as Republicans have always done.